EN IT

Technical analysis: Cisco stock punished on margins, AI software rallies and the Nasdaq signal turns tonight

Cisco stock drops 8.40% after a record quarter: gross margin falls to 66.3% on expensive AI memory. Salesforce, Palantir and Oracle rally. Eni stock and Leonardo stocks slip on the Milan market. SPY closes at a record while our weekly signal on the Nasdaq ETF reverses tonight.

Technical analysis: Cisco stock punished on margins, AI software rallies and the Nasdaq signal turns tonight
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis: Cisco stock punished on margins, AI software rallies and the Nasdaq signal turns tonight

14 August 2026 AiTrading67 · Trade Desk Observatory Markets

The 13 August session carried two stories that only make sense together. On the surface, softer-than-expected US producer prices pushed Wall Street to a fresh record high and firmed up expectations of a September rate cut. Underneath, earnings redrew the pecking order inside artificial intelligence: whoever assembles hardware is paying for expensive memory, whoever sells software is collecting.

The cards below carry the technical analysis of the stocks that moved the day — Cisco stock, Applied Materials, Oracle, Salesforce, Palantir and CoreWeave on Wall Street, Eni and Leonardo on the Milan market — and for each one the position of our model, long or short, with the date its signal fired. The closing card compares SPY and QQQ, where our weekly signal on the Nasdaq is reversing today.

The news that moved our instruments
📈
OUR MODEL
Updated to today

The week's new buy signals

The latest weekly analysis produced 27 new buy signals; ten of them are below. What matters more than any single stock is the mix: European and US defence, gold and its miners, a handful of technology stocks. The theme that actually paid this week — AI software — was not in this list.

Instrument
Daily signal
Weekly confirmed
My reading
🇺🇸 PLTRLong
Palantir Technologies
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Daily and weekly still aligned; the strongest of the cohort on intraday drive.
🇩🇪 RHMLong
Rheinmetall
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
First crack on the short horizon, the weekly structure still holding.
🇺🇸 NOCLong
Northrop Grumman
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Alignment intact on both horizons, with modest drive.
🇺🇸 BLong
Barrick Mining
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Short horizon turned to sell on the gold pullback; the weekly structure is intact.
🇺🇸 GLDLong
Gold
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Both horizons agree: the signal is born while gold gives back 1.3%.
🇺🇸 NEMLong
Newmont
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Both horizons agree, yet yesterday it dragged its own sector lower.
🇺🇸 PFELong
Pfizer
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Alignment intact and minimal movement: the quietest profile on the list.
🇺🇸 ZMLong
Zoom Communications
earnings 25/08
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Alignment intact and already 5.1% ahead, with earnings 11 days out.
🇺🇸 DISLong
Walt Disney
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
Both horizons agree; the drive still needs confirming.
🇺🇸 SNAPLong
Snap
BUY
3 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 07/08
The daily has left while the weekly holds: yesterday's push came from the sector.
How I read itFour sessions in, the cohort has gone nowhere: median at minus 0.10%, 12 stocks of 27 in the black. The uncomfortable half deserves saying too: 11 of those 27 now carry a daily sell signal, the highest share of the week. Tonight's weekly close will show which of them were merely pausing.
Our system · Palantir Technologies long (G / P) · Rheinmetall long (G / P) · Northrop Grumman long (G / P) · Barrick Mining long (G / P) · Gold long (G / P) · Newmont long (G / P) · Pfizer long (G / P) · Zoom Communications long (G / P) · Walt Disney long (G / P) · Snap long (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
Earnings and margins

Cisco stock technical analysis: a beat punished by expensive memory

Cisco Systems closed its fiscal fourth quarter with record numbers — adjusted earnings of 1.22 dollars per share against 1.17 expected, revenue of 17.25 billion against 16.82 — and raised guidance for the current quarter to 18-18.2 billion, above consensus. The stock lost 8.40%. One line explains it: gross margin fell to 66.3% from 68.4% a year earlier, eaten by the cost of memory and components for AI hardware. Demand is not the problem, with 4 billion in hyperscaler orders in the quarter alone, but whoever assembles the boxes pays the bill.

After the bell it was the turn of Applied Materials, with a record fiscal third quarter: revenue of 9.12 billion, up 24.8% year on year, a fifth consecutive beat, fourth-quarter guidance of 10.25 billion and the Semiconductor Systems margin widening to 38%. The most consequential figure is political: the China share fell to 28% from 35%, a direct reflection of export controls. The stock still gave back 2.48%.

How I read itCisco's move is worth 6.1 times its typical daily range, which makes it a rare event on that chart, and it lands while our weekly sell signal has been running since 13 July. Anyone holding Cisco stocks into the print found that out the hard way. This is the first time the cost of AI infrastructure shows up in the accounts of the companies building it rather than in the multiples of the ones using it — from here the same line is worth watching on NVIDIA and Broadcom, and on semiconductor stocks generally.
Our system · Cisco Systems short (G / P) · Applied Materials short (G / P) · NVIDIA long (G / P) · Broadcom long (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
The rotation of the day

AI software collects the cheque: technical analysis of Salesforce, Palantir and ServiceNow

Where hardware pays for margins, software defends them. Salesforce gained 4.16% after JPMorgan lifted it to Overweight, arguing that proprietary AI tooling is a durable revenue channel. Palantir Technologies added 4.66% as analysts kept raising targets following a quarter with revenue up 93% year on year. ServiceNow put on 1.85% and Snowflake 1.54%, extending the run that followed the previous day's 36% jump. Oracle closed 1.92% higher, and Oracle stocks were among the most actively traded stocks of the session.

This rotation rewards companies selling licences and platforms at high margin over those selling components, and it will be tested in the coming weeks by this same group's earnings.

How I read itThere is a detail the tape does not show and our model does: on four of these five stocks the weekly money flow does not confirm the price move. One session proves nothing; a second one separates a genuine rotation from a day of repositioning. On Oracle, where our model has been short since 15 June, a buy signal is printed on the weekly candle now forming and validates at tonight's close.
Our system · Salesforce long (G / P) · Palantir Technologies long (G / P) · ServiceNow long (G / P) · Snowflake long (G / P) · Oracle short (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
High-volatility stocks

CoreWeave, AppLovin and Snap: technical analysis of the fastest-moving stocks

A risk-friendly session lit up the usual high-volatility stocks. CoreWeave led it, with quarterly revenue doubling year on year and an adjusted operating margin of 5%, ahead of expectations: the bet on cloud infrastructure for artificial intelligence keeps paying as long as growth stays explosive. AppLovin recovered 2.93% on a mix of dip-buying and short covering, with management framing the slowdown in its advertising engine as a matter of deployment timing. Snap rose 1.92%.

How I read itOn CoreWeave the weekly buy signal is printed on the candle now forming and validates tonight, after our model had been short since 8 June. Snap reads the other way round, and it is worth stating plainly: the weekly signal holds, but weekly money is leaving and the flow has been weakening for three weeks, so yesterday's push came from the sector rather than from the company. When you are swing trading stocks like these, that distinction is what decides position size.
Our system · CoreWeave short (G / P) · AppLovin short (G / P) · Snap long (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
MILAN MARKET
Italy and Europe

Milan market: Eni stock and Leonardo stocks slip, Europe without catalysts

The Milan market traded close to its highs with few catalysts. Eni stock shed 0.65% in a session shaped by conflicting reports around a possible Middle East peace agreement, while Leonardo stocks gave up 0.74% despite a positive call from RBC. Fincantieri went the other way, adding 2.52%.

Elsewhere on the continent the early-August guidance still sets the tone: Airbus and VINCI had confirmed or raised their targets, while LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton remains under pressure after Deutsche Bank cut its price target on softer luxury demand.

How I read itThe European session had no theme of its own: of the ten stocks our screen flags as moving with their sector, exactly one was Italian. When an index produces no theme, the work moves to individual cases — and the two that count remain Eni, on crude, and Leonardo, which on our monthly signal sits two tenths of a point from its own reversal threshold.
Our system · Eni long (G / P) · Leonardo long (G / P) · Fincantieri long (G / P) · Airbus long (G / P) · VINCI long (G / P) · LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton short (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPEAN INDICES
Four baskets side by side

European indices: four buy signals open since April, one returning a tenth of the others

The four European baskets we track all carry a weekly buy signal opened in spring: DAX since 13 April, CAC 40, FTSE MIB and FTSE 100 since 7 April. Seventeen weeks in the trade, and on that they agree.

Where they part company is the result. The Italian basket returns 15.76% from the signal, the French 6.90%, the German 6.10%; the British one stops at 1.41%, a tenth of the Italian over the same span. It is also the only one of the four with the daily signal turned to sell, and the only one to have already run through its first published stop.

How I read itThe divergence is the useful part: four indices, one signal, the same age, and outcomes ranging from 1 to 16. Anyone who bought Europe as a block bought four different things. The British basket is where the structure is wearing out first, and it will be the first to hand out an exit if the picture changes.
Our system · FTSE MIB long (G / P) · CAC 40 long (G / P) · DAX long (G / P) · FTSE 100 long (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
📊
INSTRUMENTS
Baskets and sectors

The ETFs that moved the session: gold ETFs, the semiconductor ETF and the US sectors

Among the US sectors the day belonged to communications, with Communication Services US up 2.07%, followed by real estate, with Real Estate US up 1.42%. Europe sat at the other end: Basic Resources Europe gave back 2.35%, and it is the basket whose daily reading diverges most sharply from the weekly picture.

Three baskets deserve a line even without having moved the session. Gold ETFs, which we track through Gold, carry a buy signal born with the latest weekly analysis, precisely while the metal retraces 1.3% after brushing a two-month high: the gold technical analysis says the structure holds even as the daily price slips, which is why the signal fires now. The semiconductor ETF, Semiconductors, stays short on our model since 13 July, and the Cisco and Applied Materials results explain why that reading is not obvious. The Nasdaq ETF (QQQ), Invesco QQQ Trust, is the case of the day and has the closing card to itself.

How I read itThe contrast between gold ETFs opening a buy while the metal falls, and the semiconductor ETF staying short while the capital-expenditure cycle accelerates, is the clearest way to see what our weekly signal measures: the state of the price structure, not an opinion about the sector. It is also why the noise around ai trading moves our signal by exactly nothing: the model reads the chart, not the theme.
Our system · Communication Services US long (G / P) · Real Estate US long (G / P) · Basic Resources Europe long (G / P) · Gold long (G / P) · Semiconductors short (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust short (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
📅
DIARY
The next seven days

This week's earnings: the American consumer and Chinese demand

The week ahead is short on stocks and heavy on content, because it lines up the American consumer and Chinese demand.

Tuesday 18 AugustBaiduShort

Tuesday 18 AugustHome DepotLong

Thursday 20 AugustWalmartShort

Just beyond the seven-day window comes the block that matters most for the current theme: Intuit and Zoom on 25 August, Salesforce on the 26th, and Nvidia at month end.

How I read itMeasured across a full season, entering on an active signal ahead of the numbers returns about the same as entering without one, but with twice the dispersion. That is why earnings are neither a reason to open nor a reason to stay out: they are a position-size modifier, and that is where risk management actually happens. Yesterday JD showed the uncomfortable side of it, with results that overturned a still-young buy signal.
Our system · Baidu short (G / P) · Home Depot long (G / P) · Walmart short (G / P) · JD long (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu
📉
THE COMPARISON
The two US baskets

SPY and QQQ technical analysis: one closes on the record, the other switches side tonight

S&P 500 (SPY), the S&P 500 ETF, gained 0.70% and closed a whisker from its all-time high, breaking above the congestion band that had held it for five sessions. The buy signal has been open since 6 April, returns 14.49% and has already reached all three profit windows: it is a trade run by the trailing stop alone.

Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), the Nasdaq 100 ETF, did almost twice as much at plus 1.16%, and still has its own record 2.26% above the current price. On our model it is the case of the day: after three weeks of selling that began on 20 July, a buy signal is printed on the weekly candle now forming and validates at tonight's close.

How I read itThe difference sits in the weights and in the point of the cycle. The S&P basket carries 32.91% technology and 12.59% financials; the Nasdaq basket 50.54% technology and 0.24% financials, and on a day led by communications and technology that gap accounts for the whole spread. But the first arrives here with a mature structure and every target taken, the second with a compressed structure and the record still ahead: one is a trade to protect, the other one to build. That is the trading strategy question worth answering before the close.
Our system · S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust short (G / P)
Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page.
↑ back to menu

The desk's take

Margin is the new fault line

The backdrop is holding, and the numbers say so without hedging: the stress gauges are falling together — equity volatility down 22.1% over four weeks, bond volatility easing, the BTP-Bund spread tightening — while market participation has been rising for three weeks. A record high built on a broad base is worth more than one built by four stocks.

What deserves watching is not in the backdrop but inside the theme that has led the market for months. Two companies published better-than-expected numbers and both fell on the same line of the accounts, a gross margin eaten by the cost of AI components. Until now that cost showed up in the capital plans of the buyers; since yesterday it shows up in the results of the sellers. Over the coming weeks the same line is worth hunting across the whole chain, and the month-end results will say whether it is an isolated case or a rule.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been taken out — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action trading), this is the desk's trading journal: published every morning before the US premarket, with our model's position on every instrument mentioned.

Previous editions
13 August 2026Technical analysis after the US inflation print: CoreWeave and Cisco stock light up AI, Nebius stocks jump 34%, Brazil falls again12 August 2026Technical analysis of oil and semiconductor stocks: Alphabet stock pays for capex, Riot stock jumps on Anthropic, Brazil downgraded11 August 2026Technical analysis of oil and semiconductor stocks: Chevron and ExxonMobil stock run, NVIDIA stock pays for Beijing7 August 2026Technical analysis: flat indices, broken stocks - semiconductor stocks reset while Unity stock jumps 15%6 August 2026Technical analysis: Shopify stock jumps 17% while semiconductor stocks give back the rally5 August 2026Technical analysis: Palantir stock jumps 29% and drags semiconductor stocks, Caterpillar and Booking beatView all editions on the tag page →
Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn