EN IT

Technical analysis of oil and semiconductor stocks: Chevron and ExxonMobil stock run, NVIDIA stock pays for Beijing

Hormuz stays shut, crude gains 5% and US energy goes from the week's worst sector to the session's best at plus 4.66%. Technical analysis of Chevron stocks, ExxonMobil stock and Occidental, of the Beijing cap costing NVIDIA stock 2.86%, and of Apple retaking the crown.

Technical analysis of oil and semiconductor stocks: Chevron and ExxonMobil stock run, NVIDIA stock pays for Beijing
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis of oil and semiconductor stocks: Chevron and ExxonMobil stock run, NVIDIA stock pays for Beijing

11 August 2026Fabio Gentili ObservatoryTechnical analysis

The Strait of Hormuz did not reopen over the weekend and crude gained around 5% in a single session. That was enough to turn the sector table upside down: US energy, the worst comparte of the week just closed at minus 3.44%, became Monday's best at plus 4.66%. The indices, however, barely moved: the S&P 500 closed at minus 0.03% and the Nasdaq 100 at minus 0.30%. When eight names break out of their typical range together and the index stands still, somebody else is paying the same bill.

In the cards below you'll find the technical analysis of the names that moved the session — Chevron stock, ExxonMobil stock, Marathon Petroleum and Occidental on oil; NVIDIA stock and Apple stock among semiconductor stocks after Beijing's cap on H200 purchases; Vertex on a beat and Archer Aviation on the Boeing deal. Apple stocks took back the crown as the world's largest company by market value, and NVIDIA stocks paid for it. On the Milan market, Eni followed crude while Telecom Italia stayed on the losing side. For each name you'll find our model's position, long or short, with the date the signal fired.

The session cards
📈
OUR MODEL
View as of today

This week's new buy signals

Twenty-seven new buy signals and five sells: the week that closed on Friday pushed almost everything one way. Below are twelve of them, chosen as the most representative, and the horizon throughout is weekly swing trading. Three families hold them together: gold and its miners, defence and aerospace, and large-cap technology.

Instrument
Signal
Weekly confirmed
My read
🇧🇷 PDGR3Long
PDG Realty
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Brazilian construction, first and only in its category, with Signal Strength at 84%: the highest on the card. The historical scorecard over fourteen signals is harsh, though — 14.3% success and a 17.8% typical loss — and the daily horizon has already turned the other way. Results land on Friday.
🇺🇸 FSLRLong
First Solar
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
US solar, first among the twenty American names by operating profile, conviction at 76%. Over forty-six signals the scorecard shows 30.4% success with 22.4% potential: the best ratio in the group, and both horizons still agree.
🇺🇸 KODKLong
Eastman Kodak
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Conviction at 76% and fifth place among US names, but the scorecard is the frailest of the block: 15.2% success over thirty-three signals. Here Signal Strength is measuring the breadth of the move more than its quality, and that distinction matters.
🇺🇸 SNAPLong
Snap
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Sixth among US names, conviction at 76% on high volatility with a prudent entry. Historical potential is high at 31.6%, but it rests on nineteen signals only: too short a sample to build a rule on.
🇩🇪 RHMLong
Rheinmetall
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
German defence, first among European names with conviction at 75%, and the most solid scorecard on the card: 34.0% success over forty-seven signals with a 6.1% typical loss. The daily horizon has just cracked, though — on Monday the money went to energy, not defence.
🇺🇸 BLong
Barrick Mining
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Gold remains the theme, and this signal carries no severe-loss column over fifty-three cases. It had a rough first day, though: on Monday results cost it 6.41% and the daily horizon turned to sell. The weekly structure holds; Friday's entry price is no longer today's.
🇺🇸 PLTRLong
Palantir
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Defence analytics and data, conviction at 72%. On Monday Palantir stock added 1.87%, extending its post-earnings move. The only thing holding it back is the distance from the Point of Inversion, 8.1%: that is a lot for a week-old signal, and it translates into a smaller size.
🇺🇸 NOWLong
ServiceNow
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Enterprise software, conviction at 72%. The interesting detail sits on the slow horizon: the monthly sell now appears among those at risk of flipping, because price has crossed the level the other way. Two horizons finishing their argument.
🇺🇸 CCLLong
Carnival
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
Cruise lines, and the signal that suffered most on Monday: minus 4.28% with the daily horizon turning to sell. The cause is structural rather than noise — fuel is the first cost line for anyone selling travel, and crude rose 5%. The weekly structure holds, but before adding I would wait for the short horizon to come back.
🇺🇸 NEMLong
Newmont
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
The second gold name, conviction at 72% and an empty severe-loss column over forty-seven signals. On Monday it added 3.79% while the metal stood still: this is the miner that moves more than the underlying, which makes the theme both richer and more volatile.
🇺🇸 NVDALong
NVIDIA
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
The most-discussed case on the card. The protocol classes NVIDIA stock as one to discard on setup quality, while the scorecard rates it among the best of the group over forty-two signals. On Monday NVIDIA stocks lost 2.86% on Beijing's cap on H200 purchases: a regulatory constraint, the kind of news a good quarter does not fix. Results land on 26 August.
🇺🇸 GLDLong
SPDR Gold Shares
BUY
07/08
buy confirmed
week closed 07/08
The third gold instrument, and the calmest of the three: ordinary volatility and a 2.3% typical loss over fifty-three signals. Its potential is the lowest of the group, but this is how you buy the theme while paying less risk — the difference between owning the metal and owning those who dig it out.
How I read it. The most striking number is not in the table: twenty-six of the twenty-seven new buys have the daily horizon agreeing with the weekly one, that is 96%. It is the highest confirmation rate I have recorded, and it means these signals were not born against price. The flip side sits in the three broad baskets that turned to buy alongside the single names: they carry the lowest conviction readings of the group, because an index generating a signal after setting a record has already travelled the road that signal announces. On risk management the rule does not change: a signal born on a candle that has already run wants a pullback before full size.
Our model · PDG Realty long (G / P) · First Solar long (G / P) · Eastman Kodak long (G / P) · Snap long (G / P) · Rheinmetall long (G / P) · Barrick Mining long (G / P) · Palantir long (G / P) · ServiceNow long (G / P) · Carnival long (G / P) · Newmont long (G / P) · NVIDIA long (G / P) · SPDR Gold Shares long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
02 · ENERGY
The theme that moved the session

Oil rewrites the session: the technical analysis of energy stocks

The weekend produced no progress in the talks between Washington and Tehran over reopening the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway that carried roughly a fifth of the world's crude and has been paralysed since late February. Iran's foreign ministry spokesman repeated that, while the US naval blockade continues, the conditions for reopening do not exist. With transits down to a handful a day against roughly 130 before the conflict, crude rose about 5%.

As a trading strategy the read is simple, and price action trading gives it away before the headlines do. The response on the board was immediate and orderly. Marathon PetroleumLong gained 7.42%, ValeroLong 5.58%, SchlumbergerLong 5.30%, OccidentalLong 4.90%, ConocoPhillipsLong 4.61%, ChevronLong 4.48% and ExxonMobilLong 4.41% — Chevron stocks and ExxonMobil stocks led the board; the five western supermajors come off a second quarter worth roughly $48bn in aggregate profit. Eight names in the sector broke out of their typical range together, and when eight names from one sector do that on the same day the anomaly is not the stock's: it is the sector's, and the explanation sits outside the charts.

The technical analysis that matters, though, is about money flow. On ExxonMobilLong and on the Vanguard energy ETFLong the weekly flow is heading out while price runs: distribution rather than accumulation. On ChevronLong and OccidentalLong the flow holds. That is the difference between a rally somebody is using to sell and a rally somebody is still buying into, and on a day when the whole sector adds 4% it is the only way to tell the names apart. It is also why an ai trading system earns its keep by scanning the whole universe before picking any direction.

One caveat on the entry price: Marathon PetroleumLong travelled six times its own typical swing in a single day. The theme can be right and the moment wrong, and that is precisely where risk management matters more than direction.

How I read it. The sector was the worst of the week that closed on Friday at minus 3.44%, and on Monday it became the best of the day. A reversal like that does not come from structure, it comes from an external fact structure did not contain: that is why our weekly-versus-daily comparison flags a strong divergence, and why the weekly reading was not wrong. Anyone running swing trading on these names should remember that a geopolitical premium deflates as fast as it forms, and that US inflation data lands on Wednesday: the same crude that rewarded energy on Monday is the variable that can push that number higher than expected.
Our model · Chevron long (G / P) · ExxonMobil long (G / P) · Marathon Petroleum long (G / P) · Occidental long (G / P) · ConocoPhillips long (G / P) · Schlumberger long (G / P) · Valero long (G / P) · Halliburton short (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
💻
03 · SEMICONDUCTORS
Beijing's bill

NVIDIA stock and Apple stock: semiconductor stocks pay for Beijing's cap

NVIDIALong shed 2.86% after reports that Beijing would let its AI companies buy limited volumes of H200 chips, approving less than half of what was requested. It is a regulatory constraint, the kind of news a good quarter does not fix, and the retreat carried a symbolic effect too: AppleLong took back the crown as the world's most valuable company, and did so while losing 1.62% on the day after a Jefferies downgrade citing cancelled product plans and rising memory costs. A change of guard by subtraction.

The rest of the sector followed: ARM HoldingsShort down 5.21% and MarvellShort down 4.65%. Underneath sits the question that unsettles the whole group — what the spending on AI infrastructure actually returns — and investors stay wary. Software, by contrast, had a constructive day: CrowdStrikeShort up 5.01%, PalantirLong up 3.90% and DatadogLong up 11.48%, helped by sector strength and by falling yields, which lighten the valuations of names whose worth sits entirely in the future.

The largest move across our whole universe was elsewhere, though: FastlyLong up 20.86%, on double the volume of preceding sessions and with a very wide daily range. Volume confirms price, so the move is real, but no company news explains it.

How I read it. Our model has been long NVIDIA stock for a week and the position is already down 2.86%: a signal born on Friday that meets a regulatory constraint on Monday is the classic case where the chart could not have known. On software we sit on the wrong side of CrowdStrike, up 5.01% against our sell, and on the right side of Marvell. Worth saying plainly: on the same day and in the same sector the model was both right and wrong, and what decided it was the sub-sector rather than the reading.
Our model · NVIDIA long (G / P) · Apple long (G / P) · ARM Holdings short (G / P) · Marvell short (G / P) · CrowdStrike short (G / P) · Palantir long (G / P) · Datadog long (G / P) · Fastly long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
🚀
04 · DEALS
The deal of the day

Archer takes Boeing's eVTOL arm: the deal of the day

Archer AviationShort flew 11.99% after announcing the purchase of three BoeingLong subsidiaries, among them Wisk Aero, which works on an autonomous electric vertical take-off aircraft, and SkyGrid, which builds air traffic management systems for air taxis. In exchange Boeing receives roughly 19.75% of Archer's class A shares, plus options to buy more over the next four years.

It is a deal that redraws the balance of power in advanced air mobility and consolidates Archer as the sector's consolidator, with an aerospace giant as its industrial shareholder. Boeing itself shaved 0.70% on the session: it hands over a business in exchange for a stake, and the market judged that neutral.

How I read it. This is the day's uncomfortable line and it goes first: we are short Archer, our published stop has already been passed, and the worst day for a short position is the one where the company becomes its sector's consolidator. When the flag carries a corporate deal of this size, the flag decides, not the chart. On the other side we are long Boeing, which walks away holding a stake in a competitor that just got bigger.
Our model · Archer Aviation short (G / P) · Boeing long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
📊
05 · EARNINGS
Who beats, who disappoints

Earnings: Vertex beats, Rocket Lab grows 62% and the stock falls

Vertex PharmaceuticalsLong gained 6.61% after beating second-quarter estimates, with several analysts having already raised their targets in the preceding days. It is the healthcare name that pulled its own sector, and it is also one of our more mature buy signals, running since mid-June.

The more interesting case, though, is Rocket LabShort, which reported after the bell with revenue of $234.1m, up 62% year on year, earnings per share in line and third-quarter guidance above consensus — and the stock reacted badly, losing 3.37% on the session. A company growing 62% whose shares fall is telling you the price already held that growth.

Rounding out the picture, RegeneronLong added 3.02%, Eli LillyLong 3.90% and Intuitive SurgicalShort 3.85% in healthcare; against the trend, Coherent fell 11.6% on the eve of its own results. In crypto, CoinbaseShort shed 3.20% in a mixed day for the sector.

How I read it. Rocket Lab deserves an extra line because it teaches the most. We have been short since early June and the position is comfortably ahead; the company grows 62% and the stock still falls. That is not a contradiction: the weekly signal describes a structure, and a structure that has decayed for two months is not repaired by one good quarter if price had already priced that quarter in. On Coinbase the reading points the same way — the decline gains force and money leaves while price falls — and that is the line where model and session agree.
Our model · Vertex Pharmaceuticals long (G / P) · Rocket Lab short (G / P) · Regeneron long (G / P) · Eli Lilly long (G / P) · Intuitive Surgical short (G / P) · Coinbase short (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
06 · MILAN
The theme lands softened

The Milan market: Eni follows crude while telecoms stay weak

On the Milan market the American theme arrived softened, and the list of names that moved with their sector is short and honest: three against Wall Street's twelve. Eni stock added 1.27% in the wake of European oil and gas, up 1.29%; Amplifon stock 1.30% on healthcare; Telecom ItaliaShort lost 1.24% as European telecoms fell 2.14%, the sharpest divergence in the continental block.

The comparison with Wall Street shows how much less exposed Milan is to the day's theme. EniLong moved 1.27% while ChevronLong and ExxonMobilLong did more than 4%: the same theme at a quarter of the price, and that difference matters to anyone looking for an entry rather than a chase.

Across the rest of the board the technical picture is the one of recent weeks. Banco BPM stock and Unipol stocks remain among the most mature positions in our Italian basket, both with weekly relative strength above 73 and therefore little room ahead. Intesa Sanpaolo stock and UniCredit stock have held their buy signal since April. On the other side sit STMicroelectronics stock and Stellantis stocks, both on a sell.

How I read it. The useful reading here is about entry price. The energy theme is the same in Milan and in New York, but the Italian market paid a quarter of it: anyone wanting exposure without chasing Monday's move finds in Eni the cheapest entry among the names we cover. On the other side, the sell signal on European telecoms has run since late June and on Monday found its clearest confirmation: these are the cases where a slow signal stops being a forecast and becomes a description.
Our model · Eni long (G / P) · Amplifon long (G / P) · Telecom Italia short (G / P) · Banco BPM long (G / P) · Unipol long (G / P) · Intesa Sanpaolo long (G / P) · UniCredit long (G / P) · STMicroelectronics short (G / P) · Stellantis short (G / P) · Leonardo long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
🇧🇷
07 · BRAZIL
Good numbers, cold reception

Brazil: profit-taking on Petrobras despite a solid quarter

In São Paulo the picture was one of profit-taking despite the numbers. PetrobrasLong lost around 3% even after publishing one of its most solid quarters in some time, beating expectations: much of the good performance was already in the price and doubts remained over how sustainable it is. ValeShort shaved 0.6% despite higher iron ore, while ItausaLong gave up 0.7% ahead of its own results after the close.

The week ahead is dense with results on the Brazilian board, with banks, utilities and builders reporting between 12 and 14 August. That is why Brazil matters more this week than its weight would suggest.

How I read it. Petrobras is a good reminder of what a quarter actually measures: it beats expectations and the stock falls, because price had already run past those expectations on its own. On our Brazilian basket the week is decisive for two names in particular, Cosan and PDG Realty, both reporting on Friday: on the first we are long and have already passed both published stops, on the second the weekly signal has just been born while the daily has already turned the other way. In both cases the results are not an event to await with curiosity, they are what decides whether the trade still exists.
Our model · Petrobras long (G / P) · Vale short (G / P) · Itausa long (G / P) · Banco do Brasil long (G / P) · Cosan long (G / P) · PDG Realty long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
💼
08 · ETFs
The instruments of the day

The ETFs that moved the session: the energy ETF, semiconductor stocks and gold

Five baskets tell the session better than the single names. The US energy ETFLong gained 4.66% and is the outright protagonist: the sector was the worst of the week that closed on Friday and on Monday became the best of the day. Alongside it the Vanguard energy ETFLong added 4.74%, with the difference that on the latter the weekly money flow is heading out while price rises.

On the other side the US technology ETFShort lost 0.88% after a week that closed at plus 7.20%: this is the transfer that penalised the Nasdaq and not the S&P 500. Across the semiconductor and technology ETFs the picture remains Beijing's cap, and it is worth recalling that our published stop on the US technology basket was passed on 3 August with a minus 7.20%.

Anyone looking at the gold ETF finds the calmest corner of the day instead: SPDR Gold SharesLong added 1.02% while the miners ran harder — NewmontLong up 3.79% — and that is the practical difference between owning the metal and owning those who dig it out. The US healthcare ETFLong closes the picture at plus 1.67%, the only rotating sector doing the same thing on both time horizons.

How I read it. Among the five, the US energy basket and the Vanguard one on the same theme look alike on price and differ on flow: on the latter, weekly money leaves while price rises. That is the kind of detail invisible in the day's percentages and it decides which of the two holds up if the geopolitical premium deflates. On the gold ETF the opposite reading applies: it moves less than the miners in both directions, and anyone wanting the theme while paying less risk starts there.
Our model · US energy ETF long (G / P) · Vanguard energy ETF long (G / P) · US technology ETF short (G / P) · SPDR Gold Shares long (G / P) · US healthcare ETF long (G / P) · Newmont long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
📅
09 · CALENDAR
Who reports over the next seven days

This week's earnings: nine stocks under scrutiny

Nine names in our basket report by Friday. Next to each you'll find our model's position as of the last completed week.

Tuesday 11 · Home DepotLong

Wednesday 12 · E.ONLong · Banco do BrasilLong · CiscoShort

Thursday 13 · Applied MaterialsShort · JD.comLong · Intuitive MachinesShort

Friday 14 · CosanLong · PDG RealtyLong

The two names where results weigh most are CosanLong and PDG RealtyLong, both on Friday and both Brazilian: on the first we are long with both published stops already passed, on the second the weekly signal was born last week and the daily has already turned. Home DepotLong reports next Tuesday and sits on our list at minimum size precisely because of that.

How I read it. On the measurement we ran in July, entering with an active signal ahead of results returns about what the control group returns: earnings do not move the average, they widen the dispersion. So an upcoming quarter is neither a reason to enter nor a veto, it is a size modifier — full beyond three weeks, reduced within three, minimum within one. It is a single season and it may be noise, and we say so.
Our model · Cisco short (G / P) · Applied Materials short (G / P) · JD.com long (G / P) · Home Depot long (G / P) · Cosan long (G / P) · PDG Realty long (G / P) · Banco do Brasil long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
10 · EUROPEAN INDICES
Four baskets, one divergence

European indices: four baskets on a buy, one divergence

The four European baskets we follow are all on a buy and have been since April: DAXLong from the 13th, CAC 40Long and FTSE MIBLong from the 7th, FTSE 100Long from the 7th. Four months on the same side is a rare condition, and the first thing to say is that agreeing signals do not mean agreeing contents.

On Monday the move was minimal and split: Frankfurt up 0.02% and Paris up 0.03% on the positive side, Milan down 0.20% and London down 0.47% on the other. The divergence that matters is London's, which is also the basket with the lowest return from its own signal of the four, while Milan remains the highest.

The reason for the gap sits in composition, as always. The Italian basket is full of banks, the dominant theme of the European summer; the British one leans heavily on energy and commodities, which pulled on Monday but were among the weakest sectors over the week that closed on Friday.

How I read it. The useful point is that the British and Italian baskets share the same signal and the same duration with very different returns. Anyone buying "Europe" is buying four different things, and right now the gap between them is wider than the gap between Europe and the United States. On Monday, what is more, the two that rose were the two with fewer banks: a one-day role reversal, worth recording and not yet worth interpreting.
Our model · DAX long (G / P) · CAC 40 long (G / P) · FTSE MIB long (G / P) · FTSE 100 long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu
🔍
11 · TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
The comparison that matters

Technical analysis of SPY and QQQ: one out of targets, the other flipping

SPYLong, the S&P 500 ETF, has been on a buy since 6 April, so into its eighteenth week, with 13.77% earned from the signal, and on Monday closed 0.49% below its all-time high. The technical news is that all three of the system's take-profit windows have now been reached — the first at week six, the second at week eleven, the third at week seventeen: from here the plan has no targets ahead, only a rising stop, the weekly Point of Inversion, 2.73% below current levels.

QQQShort, the Nasdaq 100 ETF, tells the opposite story and is flipping right now. The signal in force was a sell from 20 July, and since then the basket has risen 5.35% above the level where that signal fired: a sell that produced nothing, and we say it with the number in front. This week the Point of Inversion printed a buy on the candle still forming, dropping the reference level by nearly 33 points. Confirmation comes only with Friday's close.

The difference between the two sits almost entirely in the weights. The S&P 500 basket carries 32.91% in technology and 12.59% in financials; the Nasdaq 100 basket carries 50.54% and 0.24%. On the day money left chips for energy, the first had four points of energy and twelve of banks as a cushion, the second had zero point six and zero point two. The result reads in one number: minus 0.49% from the record against minus 3.71%.

How I read it. It is the most useful comparison on the page because it explains the rotation better than any commentary. Two baskets on the same market, opposite signals, and the difference sits in twelve points of banks and eighteen of technology. Worth keeping in mind for the week: one of the two still has a take-profit window ahead and the other has none left, which means on the first only the trailing stop is in charge while on the second a published target still exists. On Wednesday US inflation data will decide which of the two readings holds.
Our model · SPY long (G / P) · QQQ short (G / P) · US technology ETF short (G / P) · US energy ETF long (G / P) · IWM long (G / P)
Our model's position on the weekly signal, as of Friday's close. Levels, targets and the trading plan are in each instrument's note.
↑ back to menu

The wrap

A session decided by a closed waterway

Monday was written in the Persian Gulf. No progress in the talks between Washington and Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz, crude up around 5%, and the US sector table turned upside down in a day: energy goes from the week's worst sector at minus 3.44% to the session's best at plus 4.66%. The indices, meanwhile, stood still.

For our model it was a two-sided day and we tell both sides. On the long side Chevron stock, ExxonMobil stock, Marathon Petroleum, Occidental, ConocoPhillips and Schlumberger worked on energy, Vertex on a beat and Newmont on gold. Where we sit on the wrong side — Halliburton up 5.50% against our sell, CrowdStrike up 5.01%, Archer Aviation up 11.99% on the Boeing deal — we have said so card by card, together with the level that will decide when those positions close. On Wednesday US inflation data will say whether Monday's theme holds.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been hit — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action), this is the desk’s trading journal: published every morning before the US open, with our model’s position on every stock mentioned. If you are after the concepts explained from scratch — what stops are, how to read a double bottom, what an Ichimoku cloud is — the guides live in the Education section.

The desk's other reports

The full analyses behind the cards on this page.

Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn