EN IT

The strike on the Strait of Hormuz lifts crude 2.8% and makes energy the only US sector in the green: Schlumberger stock up 4.83%, Exxon Mobil up 2.71%, Chevron up 2.12%. A California wildfire bill takes 23.07% off Edison International stock and 20.06% off PG&E.

Technical analysis: oil shock lifts energy stocks while Edison International stock loses 23% in a single session
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis: oil shock lifts energy stocks while Edison International stock loses 23% in a single session

1 September 2026 AiTrading67 · Trade Desk Observatory Markets

The 31 August session had two engines, both of them outside the charts. Over the weekend US forces struck Iranian rocket launchers on the island of Larak, described as ready to mine the Strait of Hormuz, and crude reopened with a gap: oil added 2.8% from Friday's close. Meanwhile California lawmakers introduced a wildfire bill that leaves civil liability with the publicly traded utilities: Edison International stock fell 23.07% and PG&E stock 20.06%, on volumes seven and nine times their normal levels. Wall Street absorbed the blow — the S&P 500 ETF shed 0.30%, the Nasdaq 100 ETF closed flat — and August still ended in the green.

Energy was the only US sector to finish higher, up 2.04%, with Schlumberger stock up 4.83%, Exxon Mobil stock up 2.71% and Chevron stock up 2.12%. On the Milan market the same move lifted Eni stock by 2.26%, Tenaris stock by 2.97% and Saipem stock by 2.29%, while banking consolidation kept Banca MPS stocks up 1.51%; Leonardo was the worst of the index, down 2.18%. In the cards below you will find the technical analysis of the names that moved the day — from Edison International, PG&E, Exxon, Chevron, PayPal and Tesla on Wall Street to Eni, Tenaris, Saipem, MPS and Leonardo in Milan — the seven weekly signals that turned on the bar still forming, the map of European indices and ETFs, and for each one our model's position, long or short, with the date the signal fired.

The news that moved our instruments
📈
OUR MODEL
The 28 August cohort

The week's buy signals: what changed in the first full session

The cohort was born with Friday 28 August's close — 9 signals, six of them tradable — and stays the same until next Friday. Here we publish only what changed in the first full trading session: who moved above or below their entry level, and whose picture shifted. The entry level is Friday's close itself, so the moves below are the trade's real return from the signal.

Instrument
Signal of the day
Weekly confirmed
My read
🇧🇷 MRVE3Long
MRV
BUY
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
First full session above entry and best of the cohort: up 6.17%. Brazilian homebuilding rising on the day of the energy shock.
🇧🇷 CYRE3Long
Cyrela
SELL
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
Up 5.52%, second in the cohort, yet still the only one with its daily signal on the other side since 28 August: a strong rise inside a divergence.
🇺🇸 MSTRLong
Strategy
BUY
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
Up 4.42%, fully recovering the weak close on its opening day. The price now sits 8.5% above its own Reversal Point, though.
🇺🇸 IBMLong
IBM
BUY
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
The only name in the cohort below its entry level, down 0.73%. It was already flagged as low quality at birth.
🇬🇧 RIOLong
Rio Tinto
BUY
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
No new session: London was closed on Monday for a bank holiday. Judgement resumes on Tuesday.
How I read itSeven of the nine sit above their entry level after the first full session, and the push comes from where I was not expecting it: the two Brazilian homebuilders, MRV and Cyrela, up 6.17% and 5.52% between them. On Saturday I wrote that this cohort sat far from the centre of the market; with an energy shock putting Brazilian risk back in motion, the centre of the market moved towards it. I am happy to correct that, and it is worth understanding why: when crude rises, money returns to the markets that depend on it, and Brazil is first in line. The usual criterion stands — a weekly signal is judged at Friday's close, and one good session is not a confirmation. On risk management the note I repeat concerns Strategy: full structure and high conviction, but the price sits 8.5% above its own Reversal Point, which makes the position large even when you would like it small.
MRV long (G / P) · Strategy long (G / P) · Rio Tinto long (G / P) · European autos ETF long (G / P) · Poste Italiane long (G / P) · Telecom Italia long (G / P) · Cyrela long (G / P) · Robinhood Markets long (G / P) · IBM long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
The fact of the day

Technical analysis of Edison International and PG&E stock: a bill wipes out a fifth of the value

Over the weekend California lawmakers introduced the new wildfire bill. It updates the state's wildfire response but does not shift civil liability away from the publicly traded utilities, which is what the market had been counting on: at least three research houses cut their view on the sector that same morning. Edison International stock lost 23.07%, its worst day since 2001, on seven times its normal volume; PG&E stock lost 20.06%, on nine times normal volume.

The surprise sits right beside those numbers: the US utilities ETF shed only 1.17%. Two companies lost a fifth of their value and the basket holding them barely moved a point, meaning the market priced this as a Californian event rather than a sector event. That is an implicit bet, and it is worth knowing about.

How I read itOn Edison International our model turned to sell on 3 August, four weeks before the bill, and the signal is now the most profitable in the sector: up 21.33% from the entry level. That is not foresight about Californian politics — the weekly structure was already coming apart, and the model reads structure. The utilities ETF has been short since the same 3 August and worked in the same direction. On PG&E we were long from 6 July, and that is the position this session hit squarely: the weekly signal turned to sell on Monday's forming bar, so it stays provisional until Friday's close. On price action, the detail that matters is volume: seven and nine times normal is not a rotation, it is a repricing, and repricings of that size rarely exhaust themselves in one session.
Edison International short (G / P) · PG&E long (G / P) · US utilities ETF short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🌎
GLOBAL
The broadest rally of the session

Technical analysis of the oil complex: Hormuz puts supply risk back into the price

The US strike on Iranian rocket launchers at Larak, described as ready to mine the Strait of Hormuz — the corridor carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil — was the first direct exchange of fire between Washington and Tehran in about a month. Crude reopened with a gap and added 2.8% from Friday's close, taking it to 9.7% over the month.

The sector moved as a block: Schlumberger stock up 4.83%, Petrobras stock up 4.43%, Exxon Mobil stock up 2.71%, Chevron stocks up 2.12%, Valero up 1.86%, Halliburton up 1.85%, Occidental up 1.83% and ConocoPhillips up 1.64%. The US energy ETF closed up 2.04%, the only one of eleven US sectors in the green.

How I read itOur model is long across the whole line, and on some of these positions it has been so for a long time: on Valero Energy the buy signal dates from 5 January and the trade is worth 93.72%; on ConocoPhillips 15.50%, on SLB 14.65%, on Chevron 10.01% and on Occidental Petroleum 9.70%. When a theme we have been following for months gets an external catalyst, the right question is not whether to buy it — it is how much of it you already own. And here is the part the price does not show: our weekly flow lens marks eight names out of nine as weak or lukewarm inflow, with volatility compressed. Weekly money has not followed the move yet, and it is the same signature we saw on 7 July during the previous Hormuz scare. For swing trading that is not a reason to stand still: it is a reason to treat this block as a reaction rather than a confirmed trend, and to size it as one position instead of eight.
Exxon Mobil long (G / P) · Chevron long (G / P) · SLB long (G / P) · Valero Energy long (G / P) · Occidental Petroleum long (G / P) · Halliburton long (G / P) · ConocoPhillips long (G / P) · Petroleo Brasileiro long (G / P) · US energy ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
ITALY
The Milan market

Technical analysis of the Milan market: Eni and Tenaris stocks rise with crude, consolidation holds the banks

The Milan index closed all but unchanged, down 0.04%, yet two stories ran underneath. The first is oil: Eni stock gained 2.26% — with Venezuelan investment agreements reported to be close to signature — Tenaris stock 2.97% and Saipem stock 2.29%. The second is banking consolidation heading into a busy September: Banca MPS up 1.51%, Mediobanca stocks up 1.26%, Generali up 1.00%, Intesa Sanpaolo stock up 0.13% and UniCredit stock down 0.67%.

On the other side of the index the industrials gave way together: Leonardo down 2.18%, Avio down 2.90% and Prysmian stock down 1.52%. Stellantis stock instead added 1.60%, following European autos.

How I read itOn the Italian banks our model has been long since April on all five, and it is the most solid block we hold on this market: on Intesa Sanpaolo the trade has been running for 21 weeks. On Eni we have been long since 20 July, so the crude rally lands on a structure that was already pointing the right way. On the industrials the model is short and the session proved it right: Leonardo since 24 August and Prysmian since 6 July, both lower. Where we are on the wrong side we say it in one line: we are short Tenaris and Stellantis Milano, and both rose on Monday. Two moves to note for risk management, not to chase. Saipem deserves attention: its weekly signal turned to buy on the forming bar, so it stays provisional until Friday — if it holds, Italian oil lines up with the US sector; if it retires, it was a one-day reaction. The same caveat, with the opposite sign, applies to Avio.
Eni long (G / P) · Tenaris short (G / P) · Saipem short (G / P) · Monte dei Paschi long (G / P) · Mediobanca long (G / P) · Assicurazioni Generali long (G / P) · Intesa Sanpaolo long (G / P) · UniCredit long (G / P) · Stellantis Milano short (G / P) · Leonardo short (G / P) · Avio long (G / P) · Prysmian short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
Company events

Technical analysis of Tesla, PayPal and GameStop stock: when the news sets the price

In a session thin on macro catalysts, single company events set the price. Tesla stock gained 5.51% ahead of Thursday's Cybercab event in Austin, with the market hunting for detail on the robotaxi after the limited clearance obtained in Nevada. GameStop stock rose 2.85% after preliminary second quarter results came in above expectations, with net income estimated between 290 and 310 million dollars against 168.6 a year earlier, helped by the gain on its eBay stake.

On the other side Take-Two stock lost 6.67%. On PayPal it pays to be precise: the 12.71% collapse that followed the Advent-Stripe consortium walking away belongs to Friday the 28th. On Monday the stock fell 1.85%, and our data leaves no room for interpretation.

How I read itOn Tesla our model has been long since 17 August, so the rise lands on a structure that agrees. The technical note I would add is that weekly money is flowing out while the price climbs, which is the classic profile of buying the announcement. What happens next depends on the announcement, and Thursday will tell. On PayPal we are short from the bar that closed on Friday — the signal was born after the collapse, not before it, and that is how we say it. Monday's price action does show money flowing in on a falling stock, which is worth watching on the short side. On GameStop we have been short since May and the stock rose on results: a bounce inside a selling structure does not change the structure, but when the news flag takes over, the chart moves to second place. On Take-Two the weekly signal turned to sell on the forming bar, so it is provisional.
Tesla long (G / P) · GameStop short (G / P) · Take-Two long (G / P) · PayPal short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
💻
UNITED STATES
The largest sector

Technical analysis of US technology: ten names higher, semiconductor stocks split, the sector flat

The US technology ETF closed up 0.44%, and underneath that number sits a distribution worth looking at. Circle stock gained 9.65%, Roblox 7.16%, CrowdStrike 5.77%, Sandisk 5.50%, IREN 4.70%, Strategy 4.42%, Qualcomm stock 3.83%, Fortinet 2.97%, Palo Alto Networks 2.84% and Micron stocks 2.77%, the last of these supported by a research house restating its bullish view on memory.

Anyone following ai trading as a single theme has a day in front of them that splits it in two. With the sector flat at 0.44%, ten names rising between 2.7% and 9.7% mean one thing: below them there is a vacuum. And indeed Alphabet stock fell 2.09% and Amazon stocks 2.50%, so two of the basket's heavyweights went the other way.

How I read itWhere we hold the structure we are on the right side: Palo Alto Networks has been long since 9 March, CrowdStrike since 20 April, Fortinet since 27 April, Circle Internet since 17 August with the highest conviction of the group, and on Alphabet we are short from June — Monday worked for us. On memory and semiconductor stocks we are short, and Monday's bounce went against us on Micron Technology, Sandisk, QUALCOMM and Roblox. We say so and move on: the weekly structure on those names has not changed. The read I take away from this card is a different one, and it belongs to price action trading: when the sector stands still and ten names run, breadth is thinning — and market participation, which we measure separately, has been falling for three weeks. An index that holds its level with fewer and fewer names taking part turns fragile without looking fragile.
Circle Internet long (G / P) · CrowdStrike long (G / P) · Fortinet long (G / P) · Palo Alto Networks long (G / P) · Strategy long (G / P) · NVIDIA long (G / P) · Alphabet short (G / P) · Amazon long (G / P) · Micron Technology short (G / P) · Sandisk short (G / P) · QUALCOMM short (G / P) · Roblox short (G / P) · IREN short (G / P) · US technology ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🔄
OUR MODEL
The weekly bar in progress

Seven weekly signals turned on Monday: provisional until Friday

The weekly bar that opened on Monday 31 August will close on Friday 4 September. On seven instruments in our universe the weekly signal has already changed sides on that bar, and for our model a flip printed on a bar still forming is provisional: it can retire if the week closes differently. We publish them because they are the freshest information we hold, saying exactly what they are.

Moving from buy to sell: PG&E, Avio, Take-Two, Broadcom and the Russell 2000 ETF. Moving from sell to buy: Saipem stock and Bayerische Motoren Werke stock.

How I read itThree of the seven have an obvious reason inside the session: PG&E lost 20.06% on the California bill, Take-Two 6.67%, Saipem gained 2.29% with crude. The other four do not, and those are the ones I watch more closely. Broadcom reports on Wednesday: a weekly signal turning on the eve of results is the case where a forming bar says very little, because the number that matters arrives afterwards. The Russell 2000 ETF is the most interesting of all: a sell signal appearing on the basket of the smallest companies while the two large US indices hold is the classic signature of a market narrowing. For risk management our house rule stands, and it is the simplest part of our trading strategy: you open nothing on a provisional flip, you wait for Friday's close. Anyone already in the trade, though, starts watching their Reversal Point today rather than on Friday.
PG&E long (G / P) · Saipem short (G / P) · Avio long (G / P) · Take-Two long (G / P) · Broadcom long (G / P) · Bayerische Motoren Werke short (G / P) · Russell 2000 ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPE
The four baskets

Technical analysis of European indices: Paris is the only one of the four on sell

Frankfurt's basket, the DAX, shed 1.22%; the CAC 40 lost 0.79%, the FTSE MIB 0.04% and the FTSE 100 closed up 0.25% — though the British figure is Friday's, because the exchange was shut on Monday for a bank holiday.

Distance from their own record separates the four more than the session does: Frankfurt sits 1.30% below its all-time high, Milan 2.69%, Paris 4.96% and London 8.24%.

How I read itThe information that counts is the divergence, and today it has a single name: Paris. It is the only one of the four baskets on which our model has turned to sell, and it did so recently — 24 August — while Frankfurt has been on buy since 13 April, Milan since 7 April and London since 7 April. The number that makes the divergence physical is the position relative to the weekly Reversal Point: on Paris that level sits 2.83% above the price, so it acts as a ceiling, while on Frankfurt it is 1.95% below, on London 1.98% below and on Milan barely 0.42% below. That last one is what I am watching: Milan is the basket closest to its own reversal level, and half a percentage point is one session's distance. For swing trading it means the Italian index, for all that it held up best on the day, has the least ground beneath it.
DAX ETF long (G / P) · CAC 40 ETF short (G / P) · FTSE MIB ETF long (G / P) · FTSE 100 ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📊
INSTRUMENTS
The session's ETFs

The ETFs that moved the session: energy, utilities, gold and semiconductors

Two baskets made the day on the upside. XLE — the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR, the most heavily traded US energy ETF — closed up 2.04%, and VDE, the Vanguard Energy ETF, matched it. On the other side XLU, the State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR, the US utilities ETF, lost 1.17%: it is the basket that holds the two Californian power companies that collapsed on Monday, and it is also last of the eleven sectors over the month, down 4.78%.

Among the baskets the public follows most closely, GLD — SPDR Gold Shares, the most heavily traded gold ETF in the world — closed effectively flat, down 0.11%, held back by rising yields despite the geopolitical tension. SOXX, the iShares Semiconductor ETF — the semiconductor ETF of reference — added 0.48%. In Europe EXH1, the iShares STOXX Europe 600 Oil & Gas, the European oil and gas ETF, stopped at 0.33%.

How I read itThe most useful comparison on this card is between the two energy baskets on either side of the Atlantic: the American one is up 2.04%, the European one 0.33%. Six times as much. Part of that is the closing time, which cuts Frankfurt off from the tail of the US session; part of it is not, and it is why, if you want to buy this shock through a basket, you buy it on the American side. Our model is long on bothUS energy ETF and Vanguard US energy ETF since 13 July, European oil and gas ETF since 20 July — and short US utilities ETF since 3 August, which is the position that paid most on Monday. On semiconductor ETF we are short from July and the basket rose: a session up 0.48% does not overturn a structure, but it should be said. On gold ETF we are long since 3 August: gold is the one instrument on this card that a geopolitical crisis did not move, and that says more about rates than about geopolitics.
US energy ETF long (G / P) · Vanguard US energy ETF long (G / P) · US utilities ETF short (G / P) · gold ETF long (G / P) · semiconductor ETF short (G / P) · European oil and gas ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📅
CALENDAR
The next seven days

This week's earnings: Broadcom is the real test

Five companies in our universe report over the next seven days. The date that counts is Wednesday 2 September, with Broadcom: after guiding for AI-related revenue growth above 200% year on year, it is the test of sentiment across the whole semiconductor chain. And it arrives just as its weekly signal has changed sides on the bar still forming.

Monday 1 September

Credo Technology Long

NIO Short

Wednesday 2 September

Broadcom Long

Thursday 3 September

Zscaler Long

Tuesday 8 September

FuelCell Energy Short

How I read itOur house rule on earnings is a measurement rather than an impression: across the season just past, entering with the signal already active ahead of results returned 2.12% against 2.03% for the control group. Earnings do not move the average return, they widen the dispersion — within the same sample one name gained 20.2% and another lost 20.6%. So they are not a reason to enter and not a reason to stay out: they are a reason to enter smaller. That is how risk management treats an event with unknown outcome and known amplitude. One season of data, and we declare it as such.
Credo Technology long (G / P) · NIO short (G / P) · Broadcom long (G / P) · Zscaler long (G / P) · FuelCell Energy short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
UNITED STATES
The two US baskets

Technical analysis of SPY and QQQ: the day diversification cost money

SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, lost 0.30%; QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF, closed up 0.05%. For once the ratio flipped, and the reason is not a technology one.

The block the concentrated basket barely owns — financials down 0.67%, industrials down 1.13%, utilities down 1.17%, real estate down 0.83%, materials down 0.92% — carries more than 28% of the S&P 500 and gave way together on Monday. On the Nasdaq 100 those same sectors are worth a little over 6% combined: utilities 1.54%, financials 0.24%, real estate 0.10%.

How I read itOur model is long on both, but the two trades look nothing alike. On S&P 500 the signal dates from 6 April, the trade is worth 12.89% and all three profit-taking windows have been banked, at week six, eleven and seventeen: cover is finished and from here only the trailing stop is in charge. On Invesco QQQ Trust the signal is four weeks old, the trade is down 1.96% and all three windows are still ahead. To get back to its own record the S&P 500 needs a 1.61% rise, the Nasdaq 100 a 4.45% one. The first has little to gain and a lot to protect, the second the reverse — and indeed the reward-to-risk ratio, measured at the extremes, works out at 1.27 to 1 on the S&P 500 and 1.75 to 1 on the Nasdaq 100. The methodological note I always repeat on indices: when our model classes a structure as bearish, on an index that measures how far the journey has gone, not the direction. Direction comes from the current signal, and on both it is a buy across all three horizons.
S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu

The desk's take

The backdrop: risk moves out of equities and into rates and commodities

No central bank meeting marked the day, but the backdrop is still one of waiting: the market is positioning for a more hawkish Federal Reserve at the September meeting, just as energy-driven inflation comes back into the equation. The US ten-year sits at multi-month highs and the euro held above 1.16 against a dollar that softened during the session.

The stress dashboard describes a precise shift. Equity volatility is flat, up just 3.4% on the week and unchanged over the month; bond volatility is up 5% over the month, the Italy-Germany spread 8% and rising for four consecutive weeks, tail risk 12%. Three measures of tension climbing while the most watched indicator of all stands still: risk has not gone away, it has changed market. Oil points the same way, up 10% over four weeks, as do shipping rates, up 17% on the month with a 12.1% jump in the past week alone.

The figure we keep watching is market participation, meaning how many stocks are genuinely holding the index up: down 5% over the month and falling for three weeks. That is the third consecutive week in which prices hold with fewer and fewer names taking part, and an index like that turns fragile without looking fragile.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been taken out — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action trading), this is the desk's trading journal: published every morning before the US premarket, with our model's position on every instrument mentioned.

Previous editions
30 August 2026Technical analysis: Marvell stock drops 10.28% as Wall Street sells the guidance, while Frankfurt closes a whisker from its record28 August 2026Technical analysis: Nvidia stock and cybersecurity software carry Wall Street while European stocks slide27 August 2026Technical analysis: Nvidia beats after the close, semiconductor stocks split and health care stocks slide26 August 2026Technical analysis: Moderna stock jumps 14.4%, semiconductor stocks rebound before Nvidia and luxury slides across three markets25 August 2026Technical analysis: semiconductor stocks slide before Nvidia, Stellantis stock drops 4.8% on tariffs24 August 2026Technical analysis: uranium, gold and crypto take the session while Alibaba stock pays the AI billView all editions on the tag page →

* Our system — The rows of names at the foot of each card carry our model's position, long or short. Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page. The two letters in brackets lead to the instrument page (G) and the full analysis (P).

Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Sources
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn