EN IT

One sector out of eleven rises on Wall Street and carries everything with it: Nvidia stock gains 8.74%, Salesforce 22.58%, Palo Alto 12.83%. Europe goes the other way, with Paris down 1.71% and Milan down 1.14% as UniCredit sheds 3.17%. STM and Stellantis stocks run against the tide.

Technical analysis: Nvidia stock and cybersecurity software carry Wall Street while European stocks slide
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis: Nvidia stock and cybersecurity software carry Wall Street while European stocks slide

28 August 2026 AiTrading67 · Trade Desk Observatory Markets

The 27 August session ran on a single cylinder. Of eleven US sectors, one closed higher: technology, up 3.16%. The runner-up, energy, lost 0.22%. Nvidia stock gained 8.74% on record revenue of $96.2 billion and current-quarter guidance stretched to $110.6 billion; around it the security software names did even better, with Salesforce up 22.58%, Palo Alto Networks up 12.83%, ServiceNow up 10.04% and Zscaler up 9.98%.

Europe went the other way. On the Milan market UniCredit stock fell 3.17%, Banco BPM 2.12% and A2A 2.04%, while STMicroelectronics stock rose 2.92% and Stellantis stock 2.58% against the tide. In the cards below you will find the technical analysis of the names that moved the day — from Nvidia, Salesforce, Palantir and Strategy on Wall Street to UniCredit, Leonardo, Intesa Sanpaolo and Generali in Milan, plus SAP, Deutsche Bank and Volkswagen across European exchanges — the twelve new buy signals in their fifth session, the map of European indices and ETFs, and for each one our model's position, long or short, with the date the signal fired.

The news that moved our instruments
📈
OUR MODEL
Updated to today

The week's new buy signals, in their fifth session

The weekly analysis that closed on Friday opened 17 new buy signals. We discarded five on insufficient setup quality, leaving 12 tradable names. Yesterday 5 of the 12 sat above their entry level, and the day's surprise is which one climbed back over the line: Halliburton, the very name we had flagged as the most fragile of the group.

Instrument
Signal of the day
Weekly confirmed
My read
🇺🇸 CRCLLong
Circle Internet
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Digital payments: up 7.12% above entry after a 4.82% session, the best of the twelve.
🇺🇸 CCJLong
Cameco
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Nuclear fuel: up 3.73% above entry, on the uranium theme running since early August.
🇺🇸 MRVLLong
Marvell Technology
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Semiconductors: up 1.86% above entry; it reported last night beating estimates, and the stock still gave ground.
🇺🇸 NVAXLong
Novavax
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Vaccines: up 1.23% above entry, with the session down 1.74%.
🇺🇸 HALLong
Halliburton
SELL
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Oilfield services: back above entry by 0.42% thanks to yesterday's 3.05%, with crude rebounding.
🇬🇧 GLENLong
Glencore
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Mining: down 0.25% from entry, with European basic resources still first of the twenty sectors over the month.
🇬🇧 0V1LLong
International Petroleum
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Oil: down 1.04% from entry, in a sector that only stopped falling yesterday.
🇫🇷 SANLong
Sanofi
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
European pharma: down 2.10% from entry, the lowest conviction of the twelve and the steadiest profile.
🇺🇸 TSLALong
Tesla
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Autos and robotaxi: down 2.22% from entry, though yesterday's 2.60% clawed back half the gap.
🇺🇸 FIGRLong
Figure
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Blockchain lending: down 2.76% from entry, a sharp recovery from yesterday's 5.17% shortfall.
🇺🇸 PHIOLong
Phio Pharmaceuticals
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Biotech: down 5.08% from entry after a 6.67% session, the widest move of the twelve.
🇺🇸 TLRYLong
Tilray Brands
BUY
21 August
buy confirmed
week closed on 21/08
Cannabis: down 5.58% from entry, the furthest behind and one of the most volatile in the basket.
How I read itFive sessions do not judge a cohort, and this week's swing proves it better than any argument: one name above entry on Monday, eight on Tuesday, six on Wednesday, five yesterday. A daily headcount says nothing. What can be read, and has not changed since day one, is the character of the group: most of these names carry high conviction and high volatility together, which is the profile of a wide opportunity to be managed with discipline — a different thing from a safe signal. The two steadiest are still Sanofi and Glencore, the only ones whose weekly swing stays under 7% and the only ones leaning on themes that have run for weeks. The case that interests me most today is Circle Internet: up 7.12% above entry in five sessions is the best result in the group, but its typical swing is also the second widest — and on risk management the house rule holds, size to the movement rather than to the enthusiasm. On Marvell Technology the event has passed: it reported last night with record revenue and guidance above estimates, the stock gave ground anyway, and from Monday it is a name like any other.
Circle Internet long (G / P) · Cameco long (G / P) · Marvell Technology long (G / P) · Novavax long (G / P) · Halliburton long (G / P) · Glencore long (G / P) · International Petroleum long (G / P) · Sanofi long (G / P) · Tesla long (G / P) · Figure long (G / P) · Phio Pharmaceuticals long (G / P) · Tilray Brands long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
The day's fact

Technical analysis of cybersecurity software: the sector's best session of the year

The centre of gravity sat outside the session itself: Nvidia stock digested on Thursday the results published on Wednesday after the close, rising 8.74%. The numbers explain it: $96.2 billion of revenue, earnings per share of $2.22, data-centre revenue more than doubled year on year and current-quarter guidance up to $110.6 billion, comfortably above consensus. Management added that the next-generation platform is already in full production at the large cloud operators.

The sharpest percentage return, though, came from software. Salesforce stock jumped 22.58% on a quarter above estimates and an artificial-intelligence partnership. In cybersecurity Palo Alto Networks gained 12.83%, Zscaler 9.98% and Fortinet 9.67%; Okta, which we do not cover, rose 22% on revenue of $805 million. The common thread, repeated by the sector's chief executives, is that artificial intelligence generates both more attacks and more spending to fend them off. Following behind, ServiceNow added 10.04%, Cloudflare 8.19%, Zoom Communications 6.86%, Datadog 6.70%, Autodesk 6.21% and Adobe 5.73%.

The counter-story landed after the bell. Marvell Technology posted record revenue of $2.74 billion, up 37% year on year, and next-quarter guidance of $3.15 billion, both ahead of estimates: the stock lost roughly 3% in evening trading after already shedding 1.49% during the day. Following a 187% run since January, consensus had climbed so high that even a beat-and-raise was not enough.

How I read itOur model is long every name in this card, several of them for a long time: the buy signal on Palo Alto Networks dates from March, on Fortinet from late April, on Datadog from April. This is the kind of day where a model that holds positions until the level breaks collects everything at once, and it deserves a plain statement: not one of these signals was born yesterday on the news. Anyone building a trading strategy around Salesforce stocks or Nvidia stocks yesterday was buying the headline; we were already holding. What I would add is a price action trading observation: on most of these names price flew while weekly money flow has not yet followed with the same conviction. That takes nothing away from the move, it says the move needs confirming. And two names reach their own results already red hot: Palo Alto Networks reports on Monday 1 September and Zscaler on the 3rd, both after a double-digit rise. On risk management the house rule is blunt: inside the earnings window size halves, or you wait a day.
NVIDIA long (G / P) · Salesforce long (G / P) · Palo Alto Networks long (G / P) · Zscaler long (G / P) · Fortinet long (G / P) · ServiceNow long (G / P) · Cloudflare long (G / P) · Zoom Communications long (G / P) · Datadog long (G / P) · Autodesk long (G / P) · Adobe long (G / P) · Marvell Technology long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
Crypto, AI and chips

Technical analysis of Strategy, Palantir and Micron stocks: where the rest of the money went

Outside software the money gathered around two themes. On the crypto side Strategy gained 11.54% and Coinbase Global 4.92%; on artificial intelligence applied to markets, what people now call ai trading, Palantir Technologies added 4.75%, IREN 2.40% and Nebius 2.13%. Among semiconductor stocks, by contrast, the move was far more sober than Nvidia's day would suggest: Micron Technology shed 0.32% and Sandisk 0.96%.

Chinese names split the session: Alibaba lost 2.94% on fears of fresh restrictions on artificial-intelligence chips, while Baidu rose 3.95%, seen as the group's purest exposure to the theme. Among the oil majors Exxon Mobil gave up 1.11% with crude still under pressure, and NIKE eased 0.39%.

How I read itThis is the card where our model splits, which is exactly why it is worth reading. We are long Strategy, Coinbase, Palantir and Nebius, and all four worked for us yesterday — on Strategy with a detail worth watching, because the buy signal is printing on the weekly bar still forming, the one that closes tonight: yesterday's 11.54% arrived in the very week the side changed. We are short Micron, Sandisk, Nike and Baidu: the first three went our way, Baidu did not, and we say so plainly. On IREN the model has been short since late June while the stock climbs; the session contradicts that position and we keep it, because the only level that closes a trade for us is the Inversion Point, not one awkward day. In swing trading the difference between a model and an opinion sits precisely there.
Strategy short (G / P) · Coinbase Global long (G / P) · Palantir Technologies long (G / P) · IREN short (G / P) · Nebius long (G / P) · Micron Technology short (G / P) · Sandisk short (G / P) · Alibaba long (G / P) · Baidu short (G / P) · Exxon Mobil long (G / P) · NIKE short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
ITALY
The Milan market

Technical analysis of Italian stocks: banks weigh, STM and Stellantis stocks run the other way

Milan closed down 1.14%, and the weight came from the banks. UniCredit stock lost 3.17%, the widest move on the index, Banco BPM 2.12%, Monte dei Paschi 1.98%, Intesa Sanpaolo stock 1.75% and Generali 0.39%. Outside the sector A2A shed 2.04% and Terna 2.10%.

Three different stories moved against the tide. STMicroelectronics stock gained 2.92%, carried by the wave running through American semiconductor stocks; Stellantis stock 2.58%; Leonardo stock 1.72% and Prysmian 1.60%.

How I read itThe session tested the most coherent sector on our map: our model is long every Italian bank, and yesterday European banking was the worst of the twenty sectors we follow. That deserves saying without hedging — and so does the rest: the buy signal on Intesa has run for 21 weeks and on UniCredit for 20, with double-digit accumulated gains that a day like this does not dent. It is the difference between a mature trade and a fragile one, and it shows up precisely on the bad days. The case that interests me more sits elsewhere: on STM and Stellantis our model is short, and yesterday they were the two best performers on the index. The inversion level has not been taken out, so the position stands, but those are exactly the two names where tonight's close matters. On Leonardo the buy signal has regained ground after a difficult week: yesterday's 1.72% puts it back above the level that counts.
UniCredit long (G / P) · Banco BPM long (G / P) · Monte dei Paschi long (G / P) · Intesa Sanpaolo long (G / P) · Assicurazioni Generali long (G / P) · A2A long (G / P) · Terna short (G / P) · STMicroelectronics short (G / P) · Stellantis Milano short (G / P) · Leonardo long (G / P) · Prysmian short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPE AND UNITED KINGDOM
French debt and software

Technical analysis of European stocks: Paris the worst, the DAX holds, SAP stock rebounds

Paris was the weakest market in Europe, down 1.71%, pressured by concerns over the sustainability of French public debt and by political uncertainty. London gave up 0.75%. Only Frankfurt held, up 0.19%, and the credit belongs almost entirely to one name: SAP stock rebounded 5.48% on the American software wave, a single day after an investment bank cut SAP stocks to neutral over slow progress on artificial intelligence and a weaker cloud backlog. The market bought the theme and ignored the analyst.

Behind SAP the German market moved little and in no particular order: Volkswagen AG Pref up 3.56%, adidas up 1.59% and Deutsche Boerse up 0.66%; on the other side Siemens down 0.40%, Deutsche Bank down 0.55%, Allianz down 1.44% and E.ON down 1.51%. In Paris EssilorLuxottica lost 1.07%; in London Lloyds Banking fell 2.15%, the weakest of the ten most-followed European names.

How I read itWhat stands out here is that the two widest moves run in opposite directions relative to our position, and an honest shop window shows both. On SAP we are long since late July, and the 5.48% arrives a day after the downgrade had proved us wrong: a broker's judgement is not a balance-sheet fact, and yesterday the market said as much. On Volkswagen AG Pref we are short and the stock gained 3.56%: the position stands because the level held, but the day went against us. Where the model worked cleanly is across the rest of the defensive picture: we are short E.ON and EssilorLuxottica, and both closed lower. Among European banks, Deutsche Bank remains an active buy since April and yesterday's fractional loss does not touch the structure.
SAP long (G / P) · Volkswagen AG Pref short (G / P) · adidas short (G / P) · Deutsche Boerse long (G / P) · Siemens long (G / P) · Deutsche Bank long (G / P) · Allianz long (G / P) · E.ON short (G / P) · EssilorLuxottica short (G / P) · Lloyds Banking long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📉
OUR MODEL
Under close watch

Twelve weekly signals turned to sell, and the case that shows why Friday decides

Across more than 430 instruments we follow, 12 carry a weekly signal turned to sell on this week's bar: Broadcom, Boeing, BNP Paribas, AXA, VINCI, First Solar, GE Aerospace, GE Vernova, Thales, Kering, Orange and the French index.

Twenty-four hours ago there were 13, and the names that swapped places tell more than the count. Three left — Datadog, Eaton and Mercedes-Benz — and two arrived, AXA and GE Aerospace. GE Aerospace is worth a pause: on Wednesday we reported it had left the list, because price had climbed back above its own inversion level. Yesterday it fell 3.29% and returned, with the level having moved higher in the meantime.

How I read itThis is the most useful reminder of the week, and it holds for anyone reading a weekly signal on any system: the bar still forming recalculates every evening, and a sell printed on Wednesday can vanish on Thursday and come back on Friday. Only the week's final close decides, and for this bar that close is tonight. Until then these 12 stay under close watch without being settled facts, and our model closes nothing automatically: the only level that genuinely ends a trade is the Inversion Point. The name I watch first is Broadcom, because it adds results on 2 September to a weekly sell: a corporate event landing on top of a technical move already under way either seals it or reverses it, and there is not much ground in between.
Broadcom long (G / P) · Boeing long (G / P) · BNP Paribas long (G / P) · CAC 40 long (G / P) · AXA long (G / P) · VINCI long (G / P) · First Solar long (G / P) · GE Aerospace long (G / P) · GE Vernova long (G / P) · Thales long (G / P) · Kering long (G / P) · Orange long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPE
The four baskets

European indices: Frankfurt a step from its record, Milan two tenths from its own stop

The four European baskets we track closed apart — Frankfurt up 0.19%, London down 0.75%, Milan down 1.14%, Paris down 1.71% — but the difference that matters is not the session: it is where price sits relative to the level that decides the trade.

The German basket is in the twentieth week of a buy signal up 6.39%, sits 2.45% above its own weekly Inversion Point and stands a 0.73% rise from its record: the closest of all seven indices we follow. The Italian basket is in its twenty-first week with 12.66% accumulated, the best return of the four, yet after yesterday price sits a bare 0.22% above its inversion level. The British one is in its twenty-first week with 1.87%, sits 1.73% above its level and has its record a distant 8.50% away. On Paris the signal has already turned to sell on the bar now forming, and the level stands 3.51% above price.

How I read itThe information in this card lives in the gap between the two extremes, and you will not find it in the session percentages. Frankfurt is seven tenths of a point from its all-time high; Milan is two tenths of a point from the level that would end a 21-week trade carrying a 12.66% gain. They are the two poles of the same map, and they arrived there in the same session. On Milan the margin is thin enough that tonight's close decides: our model closes nothing automatically, but that level is the only one that truly counts, and it needs watching. Paris remains the fourth case, the only one where the sell is already printed. Anyone reading only the daily percentages sees four indices within a whisker; anyone reading the levels sees four indices in four different conditions.
DAX long (G / P) · FTSE MIB long (G / P) · FTSE 100 long (G / P) · CAC 40 long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📊
INSTRUMENTS
The session's baskets

The ETFs that moved the session: technology, semiconductors, gold and European banks

Across twenty sectors on two continents the day's full range was almost five points, the widest in weeks, and at the two extremes sit two instruments telling the same story from opposite sides. XLK, the US technology ETF — the Technology Select Sector SPDR — gained 3.16%, first on the list by more than three points over the runner-up; EXV1, the iShares European banks ETF, lost 1.67%, last of the twenty. In between SOXX, the iShares semiconductor ETF, added 1.95%: far less than Nvidia's day would lead you to expect.

Among the baskets the public follows most closely, GLD — SPDR Gold Shares, the most heavily traded gold ETF in the world — closed up 0.30%, essentially flat, but remains 13.8% ahead over the month and just below all-time highs; QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF, gained 1.37% and MAGS, the Roundhill Magnificent Seven, 1.88%. What rules out a flight, though, sits outside these six: the American defensive sectors, health care and consumer staples, finished last. When a market truly runs for the exit, defensives rise.

How I read itETFs let you hold a theme without picking the name, and yesterday showed both the merit and the cost. Anyone in XLK took home 3.16%, against 22.58% for anyone in Salesforce: the basket protects you from the wrong choice and charges you the rise of the right one. Our model is long the US technology ETF since 10 August, and long GLD, the gold ETF, since 3 August, with 6% accumulated over four weeks. One position went against us yesterday and it needs stating: we are short SOXX, the semiconductor ETF, since mid-July, and the basket gained 1.95% on the sector's best day of the year. The level held, so the position stands, but it is the name on which tonight's close weighs most.
US technology ETF long (G / P) · semiconductor ETF short (G / P) · Banks Europe long (G / P) · gold ETF long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) · Magnificent Seven long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📅
CALENDAR
The next seven days

The week's earnings: cybersecurity sits the exam

Next week's calendar is short but concentrated, and it lands squarely on the sector that ran hardest yesterday. Here is who reports over the next seven days among the names we follow, with our model's position beside each.

Tuesday 1 September

Credo Technology Long

NIO Short

Palo Alto Networks Long

Wednesday 2 September

Broadcom Long

Thursday 3 September

Zscaler Long

How I read itTwo of these five have just gained double digits on the back of everyone else's results, and now it is their turn: Palo Alto Networks on Monday and Zscaler on Thursday. That is the combination demanding the most discipline of all — a move already made plus an event ahead — and our own measurement across a full season says that entering with an active signal before results does not change the average return, it widens the dispersion. So: not a ban, but a solid reason to halve the size. The name I watch first, though, is Broadcom on 2 September: it reports with a weekly sell already printed, and it is the only one of the five where the corporate result and the technical picture say opposite things. After Nvidia's day, Broadcom is also the stock that will tell us whether demand for artificial-intelligence silicon holds beyond the leader.
Credo Technology long (G / P) · NIO short (G / P) · Palo Alto Networks long (G / P) · Broadcom long (G / P) · Zscaler long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
UNITED STATES
The two American baskets

Technical analysis of SPY and QQQ: same signal fired the same day, two opposite jobs

SPY, the S&P 500 ETF (S&P 500), closed up 0.66%; QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF (Invesco QQQ Trust), up 1.37%, exactly double. Weighting explains the gap: the Nasdaq basket carries 50.54% in technology against 32.91% for the other, and a mere 0.24% in financials against 12.59%. On a day when a single sector rose, that composition is worth everything.

On both, our daily buy signal fired yesterday, and on both the short-term inversion level crossed below price: from ceiling to floor in one session. From there the two part company. To return to its own record the first needs a 1.07% rise, the second 3.82%. The first is in the twenty-first week of a signal up 13.49%, with all three profit-taking windows already banked and its stop 11.12% above the entry price. The second is in the third week of a signal still 1.36% below entry, with every window ahead and its stop 5.16% under the entry.

How I read itThis is the comparison that explains rotation better than any commentary, and yesterday it added a third element you rarely get to see. On the weekly frame money is flowing into the first basket and still flowing out of the second: two indices that move together every day, carrying the same signal fired on the same day, with flows of opposite sign underneath. The first has a gain to preserve — mature structure, every window closed, and the discipline that says protect rather than add. The second has a position to defend, with a stop 3.84% away that is the single number in its management. In swing trading the costliest mistake is treating them as the same job.
S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu

The desk's take

The backdrop: inflation checks the party, participation stays thin

What kept the euphoria in check was the inflation print. The American core index held at 3.3% year on year, above the central bank's 2% objective, reinforcing the sense that disinflation has stalled rather than reversed. Rates responded in kind: the ten-year yield climbed towards 4.65% and expectations of an imminent cut cooled. That is why an extraordinary set of results carried the technology basket to 1.37% and the broad one to just 0.66%.

The stress dashboard remains the calmest in weeks: equity volatility fell 4.6% on the day and 9% over four weeks, bond volatility 16% over the month, and the BTP-Bund spread is virtually motionless. None of our indicators moved enough to trip the shock sensor. Two readings run the other way and are worth watching: tail risk is up 2% over the month and has been rising for three weeks, and shipping rates gained 9.4% in a single week.

The number we keep under watch is market participation — how many stocks are genuinely holding the index up. It recovered 1.3% yesterday, but across the week it is still down 8.7%. One sector rising out of eleven and participation falling say the same thing from two angles, and it is why our daily panel stays amber despite the green indices.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been taken out — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action trading), this is the desk's trading journal: published every morning before the US premarket, with our model's position on every instrument mentioned.

* Our system — The rows of names at the foot of each card carry our model's position, long or short. Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page. The two letters in brackets lead to the instrument page (G) and the full analysis (P).

Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Sources
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn