EN IT

A second session of gains with Europe on board: daily buy signals jump from thirteen to forty-eight. Snowflake stock climbs 16.55% on strong guidance while Broadcom slips 2.74% despite beating estimates. Strategy and Robinhood stocks both add more than sixteen percent as financials lead.

Technical analysis: Snowflake stock jumps 16.55% on strong guidance while Broadcom slips despite beating estimates
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis: Snowflake stock jumps 16.55% on strong guidance while Broadcom slips despite beating estimates

4 September 2026 AiTrading67 · Trade Desk Observatory Markets

The 3 September session delivered a second straight advance, and this time Europe came along. Comments from a Federal Reserve governor on easing price pressures cooled expectations of tightening: Wall Street gained more than one percent, the Milan market 0.83%, London 0.70%, Frankfurt 0.66% and Paris 0.16%. Across our universe of more than four hundred instruments, 48 daily buy signals fired against thirteen the day before — the difference between a narrow rotation and a rising tide.

In the cards below you will find the technical analysis of the names that moved the day — Snowflake stock up 16.55% after results, Strategy and Robinhood stocks both above sixteen percent, Broadcom lower despite a quarter above estimates, Oracle and Palantir stocks joining the move, and in Milan MPS and Mediobanca on the European Central Bank's clearance of their merger — and for each one our model's position, long or short, with the date the signal fired.

The news that moved our instruments
🌎
GLOBAL
The day's story

Technical analysis of the session: from thirteen daily buy signals to forty-eight

Wall Street strung together a second positive session: SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, gained 1.05%, QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF, 1.19%, and IWM, the small-cap basket, 0.40%. Europe followed this time: Milan up 0.83%, London 0.70%, Frankfurt 0.66%, Paris 0.16%. On Wednesday the two continents had closed on opposite sides.

The figure that captures the day is not the index level, it is the signal count. Across our universe, daily buy signals went from thirteen to forty-eight in twenty-four hours, and among the forty-eight there are broad index funds sitting alongside single names. On the S&P 500 ETF volume climbed back to 43.5 million shares from 29.6, up 47%, with the bought share at 86.93%: Wednesday's move was short covering, Thursday had fresh money behind it.

How I read itThe underlying picture has eased, and for the first time this week I say so looking at our own readings rather than at headlines. Instruments we track with the daily timeframe against the weekly fell from 36 to 28, and the broad US basket returned to a buy on the short timeframe as well: on Wednesday none of the seven indices was there. One crack has not closed, though. Market participation — how many stocks are actually holding the index up — was flat for a session and has been falling for three weeks, down 4.7% over the month. Outside equities the two real-economy gauges keep running: crude is up 16.8% over four weeks and shipping rates 12.9%, with 9.5% added in the past week alone. On the debt side tension is slowing: the Italy-Germany spread is still up 6.4% over the month but gave back 1.4% last week, its first decline after four. For risk management the practical consequence has shifted since Wednesday: from «every position is born into a headwind» to «the wind has turned for a day», and the difference is that one more position can be opened today without needing an argument for it.
S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) · Russell 2000 ETF long (G / P) · FTSE MIB ETF long (G / P) · DAX ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📊
UNITED STATES
Two faces of the same quarter

Technical analysis of semiconductor stocks and software: two beats, two opposite reactions

Two companies beat estimates on the same evening and the market treated them in opposite ways. Snowflake stock gained 16.55% on revenue and earnings above expectations and robust guidance for the current quarter — and among software and Snowflake stocks it was the widest move of the session. Broadcom fell 2.74% despite posting revenue of 29.6 billion dollars and adjusted earnings per share above consensus, with semiconductor revenue more than tripling: what weighed was the fourth fiscal quarter outlook, 34.8 billion against the 35.03 expected.

The evening before had played out the same way on two other names: Lululemon shed roughly eighteen percent and Guidewire nineteen, both after cutting forward guidance. The rule the market is applying in this phase is a single one, and it covers the whole sector: the quarter just closed counts for little, what counts is the sentence about the quarter ahead. Anyone following ai trading as a single theme faces the same lesson: demand for artificial intelligence is not in question, what is in question is the price the market will pay for it.

How I read itOn Snowflake our model has been long since week fifteen and the position is worth 107.01%: yesterday's move lands on a structure that was already the most solid on our US list, with weekly money flowing in and strengthening for three weeks. It should be said, though, that after a move worth 9.7 times the stock's typical swing the entry point has got worse, not better: anyone not already in waits for a pullback. On Broadcom we are long from week four and the position is down, with a sell flip printed on the weekly candle still forming: the stock sits 11.13% below its own exit level, so tonight's close will confirm it. The rest of the sector held up without trouble: Nvidia stock up 1.80%, Micron 0.22%, Oracle stocks 5.69% with our model long from week three, Palantir 7.71% with the model long from week four and the position at 6.12%, ServiceNow 6.49% with a long from week four worth 16.58%. The price action reading I take away is this: the market punished the name and not the theme, which is the opposite of Wednesday, when one company's disappointment dragged the whole sector down.
Snowflake long (G / P) · Broadcom long (G / P) · NVIDIA long (G / P) · Micron Technology short (G / P) · Oracle long (G / P) · Palantir Technologies long (G / P) · ServiceNow long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
💰
UNITED STATES
Where the money went

Technical analysis of financial stocks: platforms and crypto ahead of everything else

US financials led the day with XLF up 1.56%, and inside that number the moves are far wider. Strategy stock gained 17.56%, Robinhood 16.57%, Circle 16.46%, Coinbase 10.14%. What ties them together is bitcoin's advance and the accumulation by treasury companies holding it. Further back but in the same direction, S&P Global up 4.37%, Interactive Brokers 4.30%, SoFi stocks 3.76% and Goldman Sachs 3.34%.

Four of those moves rank among the widest across our whole universe, and all eight of the day's outsized moves were to the upside, averaging 11.9%. When the exceptional moves all sit on one side, what you are looking at is risk appetite. For anyone building a trading strategy around this corner of the market, Strategy stocks, Robinhood stocks and the other crypto-linked names now move as a single block rather than as separate companies.

How I read itOur model is long every name in this card, and it is the sector where the work is paying best: on Robinhood Markets the signal fired last week and is already worth 18.08%, on Circle Internet 17.33% in two weeks, on Goldman Sachs 14.33% after twenty-one weeks, on Interactive Brokers 13.76% after twenty, on Strategy 7.95% in a single week. On financials as a sector we have been long since April. One note matters for anyone reading this to trade, and it is not a detail: four of these names moved between three and ten times their own typical swing in a session, and on Strategy the exit level has been left 15% behind the price. Buying today means entering with the stop far away, which is to say with much more risk per unit of capital than two days ago. For swing trading the consequence is that these names are bought on a pullback rather than on the candle of enthusiasm. The sector also carries the highest overbought reading on the US grid at 71: it is a train that is moving, and it has already left.
Strategy long (G / P) · Robinhood Markets long (G / P) · Circle Internet long (G / P) · Coinbase Global long (G / P) · S&P Global long (G / P) · Interactive Brokers long (G / P) · SoFi Technologies long (G / P) · Goldman Sachs long (G / P) · US financials ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
ITALY
The Milan market

Technical analysis of Italian stocks: clearance for the MPS-Mediobanca merger and the Iveco offer

The Milan market closed 0.83% higher, with two genuine corporate developments underneath. First, the European Central Bank authorised the merger by incorporation of Mediobanca into MPS and cleared two new board appointments; the deal goes to a shareholder vote on 29 October. MPS stocks and the other Italian banks moved together on the news: MPS stock closed up 1.60% and Mediobanca up 2.07%. Second, Italy's market regulator approved the offer document for Tata Motors' tender offer on Iveco at 14.10 euros per share, with the acceptance window running from 7 September to 26 October; Iveco closed all but unchanged at minus 0.07%, as befits a stock whose price is now anchored to the offer.

At the top of the board Lottomatica stock rose 5.77%, followed by Stellantis at 4.21%, Telecom Italia at 2.79%, Azimut at 2.77% after a broker upgrade and Poste Italiane at 2.47%. The banking block worked as one: Unipol up 1.68%, BPER Banca 1.61%, Banco BPM 1.43%, FinecoBank 1.39%, Generali 1.38%, Intesa Sanpaolo stock 1.28%, UniCredit 1.04%. At the bottom Brunello Cucinelli minus 1.72%, Campari minus 1.69% and Leonardo minus 1.46%.

How I read itThe Italian banking block remains the strongest part of our entire book, and yesterday it gained on the news that concerns it directly: we are long all of them since April, and on Mediobanca the position is worth 35.95%, on Banco BPM 28.51%, on Monte dei Paschi 26.38%, on Assicurazioni Generali 24.57%, on Intesa Sanpaolo 19.05%, on UniCredit 17.87%, on UNIPOL ASSICURAZIONI 17.69%, on FinecoBank 12.76%. That is eight positions opened twenty weeks ago on the same sector, every one of them in profit. The short side is working too: we are short Stellantis Milano from week eleven with 20.17%, STM from week six with 18.20%, Moncler from week twenty-three with 11.38%, Snam from week fifteen with 9.68%. On Iveco we are short from week eighteen and the position is essentially flat: the offer has frozen the stock, and an anchored price offers no move to capture in either direction. One technical note is worth flagging on the index itself: the FTSE MIB sits five hundredths of a point above its weekly exit level, the tightest of the four European baskets, and I cover it in the card below.
Monte dei Paschi long (G / P) · Mediobanca long (G / P) · Iveco short (G / P) · Lottomatica short (G / P) · Stellantis Milano short (G / P) · Telecom Italia long (G / P) · Azimut long (G / P) · Poste Italiane long (G / P) · UNIPOL ASSICURAZIONI long (G / P) · BPER Banca long (G / P) · Banco BPM long (G / P) · FinecoBank long (G / P) · Assicurazioni Generali long (G / P) · Intesa Sanpaolo long (G / P) · UniCredit long (G / P) · Brunello Cucinelli long (G / P) · Davide Campari-Milano long (G / P) · Leonardo short (G / P) · STMicroelectronics short (G / P) · Moncler short (G / P) · Snam short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇩🇪
EUROPE
Germany, France, United Kingdom

Technical analysis of European stocks: three weekly signals turning in the same week

Away from Milan the European session has a thread that Italy does not show: three of our weekly signals are changing side, and all three settle at tonight's close. BMW stock is turning from sell to buy after fifteen weeks, while Barclays and Safran are turning the other way, from buy to sell. All three rose in the session: BMW up 1.78%, Barclays up 2.06%, Safran 0.85%.

The rest of the continental market followed the rebound. Volkswagen stock up 3.61%, Prudential 3.49%, Deutsche Bank 1.94%, Deutsche Börse 1.79%, Vinci 1.39%, Deutsche Telekom stocks 1.05%. Lower were Rheinmetall at minus 1.85%, Siemens minus 1.17%, Engie minus 0.50% and Shell minus 0.33%.

How I read itThe best trade we hold in Europe is Deutsche Bank: long for twenty weeks and the position is worth 22.97%, with the price still 9.12% above its own exit level, so the cushion is wide. Behind it come Bayerische Motoren Werke short from week fifteen with 16.99%, Engie short from week sixteen with 11.86%, Barclays long from week twenty-one with 11.88% and Deutsche Börse long from week seven with 10.51%. The two positions that tonight's flips would call into question are among the best ones, and that is the point of the day: on BMW the signal is about to close a decline that worked, on Barclays a rally that worked. A signal turning after it has made money is not a failure of the model, it is how a trade ends. The most delicate case, though, is Siemens: long for twenty weeks with 9.27%, and the price sits just 0.68% above its own exit level — the same condition as the FTSE MIB, and on a single stock one bad session eats a cushion that thin. Where the model is on the wrong side I say so: Volkswagen and Prudential both rose more than three percent yesterday and we are short both, though on the first the position is still 5.07% in profit; on Rheinmetall we are long from week four and the trade is down 6.65%. For risk management the rule here is the usual one about candles still closing: until tonight those three flips are provisional, and a position is not opened on a signal that has not yet been born.
Deutsche Bank long (G / P) · Bayerische Motoren Werke short (G / P) · Barclays long (G / P) · Safran long (G / P) · ENGIE short (G / P) · Deutsche Boerse long (G / P) · Siemens long (G / P) · Deutsche Telekom long (G / P) · Shell long (G / P) · Volkswagen AG Pref short (G / P) · VINCI short (G / P) · Prudential short (G / P) · Rheinmetall long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPE
The four venues

Technical analysis of European indices: Milan returns the most and is closest to breaking

All four venues closed higher, but our signals divide them sharply. FTSE MIB up 0.83%, FTSE 100 up 0.70%, DAX up 0.66%, CAC 40 up 0.16%.

Three are on a buy and one on a sell. Milan has been on a buy for twenty-two weeks and the trade is worth 12.47%, comfortably the best of the four; London twenty-two weeks at 2.23%; Frankfurt twenty-one at 4.97%. Paris is the only sell, dating from 24 August, and that trade is worth 4.05%. From their own records, Milan is 3.53% away, Frankfurt 2.26%, Paris 5.57%, London 8.12%.

How I read itThe real divergence today is not between risers and fallers, it is in the distance from the level that closes the trade. The FTSE MIB sits five hundredths of a point above its weekly reversal level: the basket that has returned the most is also the one a single bad session would take out after twenty-two weeks of work. The DAX has 1.31% of headroom, the FTSE 100 2.06%. The CAC 40 instead sits 3.03% below its level, consistent with a sell signal that has been running for two weeks. There is a reading here that yesterday's numbers do not show on their own: an index five hundredths from its level is not an index in trouble, it is an index that has run a long way and now has the stop pressed right against it. For risk management on anyone holding Italian positions, the consequence is that the margin for error right now is thinner here than on the other three venues, and it is worth knowing beforehand rather than after.
FTSE MIB ETF long (G / P) · DAX ETF long (G / P) · CAC 40 ETF short (G / P) · FTSE 100 ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📊
INSTRUMENTS
The baskets that moved

The ETFs that moved the session: the gold ETF, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq funds, European banks

GLD — SPDR Gold Shares, the most heavily traded gold ETF in the world — gained 1.85%, the widest move among the baskets we follow, driven by a weaker dollar and retreating yields. XLF — the Financial Select Sector SPDR, the US financials ETF — closed up 1.56% and led the session. XLK — the Technology Select Sector SPDR, the US technology ETF — rose 1.29% after standing still the day before.

In Europe EXHG — the iShares European automotive ETF — gained 1.70% and led the continent, while EXV1 — the European banks ETF — added 1.44%. At the bottom XLE, the US energy ETF, at minus 0.74%: it is the month's best sector at plus 10.42% and yesterday it eased off while crude was still rising.

How I read itOur model is long all six of these baskets. The case worth attention is the last one: when the commodity runs 16.8% in four weeks and the companies extracting it stall, the market is usually starting to treat that price as unsustainable. It is not a reason to close, it is a reason to watch XLE next week. On the gold ETF the position has been open since early August and the metal is up 3% over the month: it is the one part of the dashboard working as a haven in a phase when the traditional havens are not. One note on the broad funds, because something unusual happened yesterday: six index funds covering largely the same companies — the US total market, the world, three versions of the international basket and the S&P 100 — all fired a daily buy in the same session. Anyone taking them all would be buying the same market six times and paying six commissions: you take one.
gold ETF long (G / P) · US financials ETF long (G / P) · US technology ETF long (G / P) · European autos ETF long (G / P) · Banks Europe long (G / P) · US energy ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
OUR MODEL
The 28 August cohort

This week's buy signals: the last session before the close

The cohort is the one born at Friday 28 August's close — 9 signals, six of them tradable — and it closes today. Here we publish only what changed in the fourth session, and today there is a single change.

Instrument
Daily signal
Weekly confirmed
My reading
🇺🇸 MSTRLong
Strategy
BUY
28 August
buy confirmed
week closed 28/08
A double change, the strongest of the week: a 17.56% session takes the price above its entry level for the first time (it was 3.24% below yesterday), and the daily signal has turned back to buy after moving to sell on Wednesday.
How I read itStrategy ends the week in the opposite position to the one it started in: a signal born last Friday that found nothing in its favour for three sessions, then recovered more than ten points in a day and moved above its own entry. It carries the same warning I give in the financials card, though: the move is worth 5.8 times the stock's typical swing and the exit level has been left 15% behind. Outside the cohort but on the same side, Robinhood Markets deserves a mention: yesterday's 16.57% takes its position to 18.08% in a single week, even though our protocol rejected it on setup quality. That is a case where the filter cost us something, and we say so. The rest of the cohort is quiet: Poste Italiane and Telecom Italia rose with the Milan market but remain below their entry, while Rio Tinto and European autos ETF still have the daily timeframe against them. For risk management the criterion is unchanged: setup quality is medium across all nine, so position sizes stay contained throughout.
MRV long (G / P) · Strategy long (G / P) · Rio Tinto long (G / P) · European autos ETF long (G / P) · Poste Italiane long (G / P) · Telecom Italia long (G / P) · Cyrela long (G / P) · Robinhood Markets long (G / P) · IBM long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📅
CALENDAR
The next seven days

This week's earnings: Adobe and Avio next Thursday

The next seven days on our universe are light and bring two names, both on the same day.

Thursday 10 September

Adobe Long

Avio Long

How I read itAdobe stock is the better case of the two: our model has been long since week seven with 20.44%, it is the only one of the pair with both timeframes on a buy, and in the sessions before the results volatility has compressed while the lows have stopped falling. That is the profile of a stock that has gone quiet ahead of the event, and it does not tell you the direction. Avio arrives in the opposite condition: weekly on a sell, daily on a sell, money flowing out and lows down 6.37%, with none of the signs that usually precede a positive reaction. The operating note is the usual one, and it comes from our own measurement across a full earnings season: results do not shift the average return, they widen the dispersion. On a stock about to report you reduce the size, without zeroing it and without doubling it. Looking further out, Oracle reports on 14 September after gaining 5.69% yesterday, and we are long from week three; on the date there remains a discrepancy between our own records and some industry sources pointing to the 10th, and until that is settled both are worth keeping open.
Adobe long (G / P) · Avio long (G / P) · Oracle long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
UNITED STATES
The two US baskets

Technical analysis of SPY and QQQ: the comparison flips in twenty-four hours

SPY, the S&P 500 ETF, gained 1.05%; QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF, 1.19%. On Wednesday it had gone the other way, with the technology basket doing exactly half of the broad one. The cause is the same on both days and it can be measured: technology accounts for 50.54% of the Nasdaq basket, and on Wednesday it stood still while yesterday it gained 1.29%. A concentration like that works in both directions, and across two consecutive sessions it showed first one face and then the other.

The technical picture remains very different. SPY has been on a buy since week twenty-two with 13.79%, has banked all three profit-taking windows, and needs a 0.80% rise to reach its own record. QQQ has been on a buy since week four, the trade is still 1.83% below entry, no window has been reached and the record is 4.32% away.

How I read itBoth have moved back inside their own no-trade zone, and the same geometry means two different things. On the broad basket the record is less than a point away and only three technical references remain above the price, all within eight tenths: two sessions of gains carried it through the entire cluster of resistance and left it behind. On the technology basket the room ahead is five times as wide, and the level that decides the short-term signal has landed exactly on the price, three hundredths of a point away. The operating difference comes down to one figure: on the first, what there is to gain up to the record against what is risked down to the stop is worth 0.34 to 1; on the second, 1.44 to 1. The first has a lot to protect and little to take, the second has everything ahead and has yet to prove anything. The price action says the same thing on both, however: inside the zone the system proposes no entries and waits for a close outside it, one way or the other.
S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) · Russell 2000 ETF long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu

The desk's take

The bigger picture: two sessions of truce, with the calendar ahead

What drove these two days is a shift in rate expectations rather than better macro data: comments from a Federal Reserve governor on easing price pressures cooled tightening fears and brought yields back down. The calendar looms, though: the European Central Bank decides on 10 September and the Federal Reserve on the 16th. A rebound built on an expectation holds as long as the expectation does, and the test arrives in six to twelve days.

The stress dashboard is mixed. The Italy-Germany spread remains up 6.4% over the month but gave back 1.4% last week, its first decline after four straight; bond volatility, by contrast, is up 3.7% over the month and 5.2% in the past week. Outside the financial block two real-economy gauges keep running together: crude is up 16.8% over four weeks and shipping rates 12.9%, with 9.5% added last week. Physical trade and oil rising while central banks debate inflation is not a combination that helps anyone hoping for lower rates.

The number we keep watching is market participation — how many stocks are genuinely holding the index up. It was flat for a session and has been falling for three weeks, down 4.7% over the month. A market gaining more than one percent while that measure does not move is a market held up by a few names, and that is the crack that has not closed.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been taken out — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action trading), this is the desk's trading journal: published every morning before the US premarket, with our model's position on every instrument mentioned.

* Our system — The rows of names at the foot of each card carry our model's position, long or short. Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page. The two letters in brackets lead to the instrument page (G) and the full analysis (P).

Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Sources
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn