EN IT

Tuesday 22 September Wall Street rotates: Charles Schwab down 6.11%, Royal Caribbean down 6.14%, US banks off 2%, materials up 1.65%. Milan down 0.45% with Poste, FinecoBank, Telecom and Generali below minus 3%, STM up 4.37%, and gold rising as Hormuz deflates defence.

Technical analysis: Charles Schwab and Royal Caribbean stock slide 6% as AI agents hit consumer-inertia names, while semiconductor stocks hold up
Get the Economic Observatory by email
Every new edition · free · unsubscribe in one click
Done! Check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
Something went wrong. Please try again shortly.
Add the Economic Observatory to your emails
You're already with us: add it to your emails from your preferences.
Manage your emails →
Economic Observatory · The session

Technical analysis: Charles Schwab and Royal Caribbean stock slide 6% as AI agents hit consumer-inertia names, while semiconductor stocks hold up

23 September 2026 AiTrading67 · Trade Desk Observatory Markets

Tuesday 22 September was a session that stood still on the surface and moved house underneath: on our data the S&P 500 ETF closed flat and the Nasdaq 100 ETF added 0.81%, yet US financials lost 2% while materials gained 1.65%. The Milan market shed 0.45%, weighed down by banks and insurers, and the spread between Italian and German ten-year yields widened by 2.86% — the largest macro move of the day.

In this edition you will find the technical analysis of the names that made the session, with our model's position on each. On Wall Street Charles Schwab stock fell 6.11% and Royal Caribbean stock 6.14%, two of the consumer-facing stocks hit hardest, while among semiconductor stocks Micron stock rose 5.00% and Newmont stock 3.42%. In Milan Poste Italiane closed at the bottom of the index at minus 3.97%, followed by FinecoBank and Telecom Italia, while STMicroelectronics gained 4.37%. Our trading strategy on each name is set out below.

It was a day our model collected heavily on the short side: short Royal Caribbean at 19.56%, short Charles Schwab at 4.66%, short Adobe at 5.54%, short Orange at 5.26%. Every reading comes from a systematic model, that is ai trading applied to about 450 instruments, and they remain references: the choice always belongs to whoever trades.

The news that moved our instruments
🇺🇸
WALL STREET
Habit-based businesses pay the bill

Charles Schwab stocks and Royal Caribbean stocks down 6%, US banks under pressure while the index stays flat

The fact of the session is not where the indices closed, it is who was sold. Charles SchwabShort lost 6.11%, a move worth six times its typical swing, and Royal CaribbeanShort 6.14%. Behind them the large banks: Wells FargoLong down 3.92%, JPMorgan ChaseLong down 3.42%, Bank of AmericaShort down 3.04%. The US financial sector closed at minus 1.97%, the worst of the day.

According to press reports, the thread linking these names is a thesis: personal AI agents erode businesses that live on customer inertia — the reluctance to switch provider, compare prices or look for alternatives. Banks, insurers and online travel are the trades that collect that inertia. On the other side cybersecurity held up, with CrowdStrikeLong up 0.28% and Palo Alto NetworksShort up 0.76%.

How I read itThis is the day our model collected most on the short side, without having to guess the headline: we were already short Royal Caribbean from 17 August, now at 19.56%, short Charles Schwab from 14 September at 4.66% and short Bank of America at 2.65%. On CrowdStrike the long opened on 20 April is worth more than double the entry. We are long Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, and the day went against us: on both, this week's candle is turning the signal to sell, but that reversal is still forming and only becomes real at Friday's close. In the day's price action the telling detail is volume: on thirteen of the fourteen outsized moves trading stayed normal, and only Royal Caribbean had volume confirming price, with 87.4% on the sell side.
Charles Schwab short (G / P) · Royal Caribbean short (G / P) · Wells Fargo long (G / P) · JPMorgan Chase long (G / P) · Bank of America short (G / P) · CrowdStrike long (G / P) · Palo Alto Networks short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇺🇸
TECHNOLOGY
Silicon holds, software does not

Semiconductor stocks still rising with Micron and Arm, while Adobe and Cisco stocks drop 4.5%

The second day of the tech rally split chipmakers from software. MicronLong gained 5.00% ahead of its 30 September results, ArmShort 3.19%, QualcommLong 2.08%, IntelShort 1.71% and AMD stockShort 1.34%. On the other side Adobe stockShort fell 4.52% and Cisco stockShort 4.50%, the two software stocks that broke with the rally: two of the three worst names in the whole basket on a rising day.

Among the megacaps, small moves in both directions: Nvidia stockLong up 0.66%, BroadcomShort up 0.52%, AppleLong up 0.23%, while MicrosoftLong shed 0.72%, AlphabetShort 1.07%, AmazonShort 1.34% and MetaLong 0.63%. On the crypto side MARA HoldingsLong added 2.64%, Riot PlatformsShort 3.10% and CleanSparkShort 2.57%. The best performers were GameStopLong at 5.58% and AmgenShort at 4.34%.

How I read itAmong chipmakers our model is long where the move is steadiest: Micron at 12.40%, Qualcomm at 8.96%, Nvidia at 2.19%. In software we are short Adobe at 5.54% and Cisco at 4.91%, and both worked yesterday. On Arm, Intel and AMD the confirmed weekly signal is still a sell and this week's candle is turning it to buy: a reversal still forming, to be confirmed on Friday. We are short Amgen and the day went against us. For risk management the point is Micron: it reaches its results with the strongest structure in the group, and precisely for that reason the size should be cut, not raised.
Micron Technology long (G / P) · ARM short (G / P) · QUALCOMM long (G / P) · Intel short (G / P) · Advanced Micro Devices short (G / P) · Adobe short (G / P) · Cisco Systems short (G / P) · NVIDIA long (G / P) · Broadcom short (G / P) · Apple long (G / P) · Microsoft long (G / P) · Alphabet short (G / P) · Amazon short (G / P) · Meta Platforms long (G / P) · MARA long (G / P) · Riot Platforms short (G / P) · Cleanspark short (G / P) · GameStop long (G / P) · Amgen short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🌍
COMMODITIES
Hormuz deflates defence

Lockheed Martin and RTX stocks fall with oil, while Newmont and Barrick stocks rise with gold

The day's second driver came from the Gulf. According to press reports an Iranian offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz removed the geopolitical risk premium, with a double effect: the oil price lost 1.24% in its fifth consecutive down session, and defence names fell. Lockheed MartinShort dropped 2.44%, RTXShort 1.72% and BoeingShort 1.71%; in Europe BAE SystemsShort lost 2.78%.

On the same day materials were Wall Street's best sector at 1.65%, and the gold price closed up 0.39%. NewmontLong gained 3.42%, leading the sector, and BarrickLong 2.79%. The pairing deserves attention: a shrinking geopolitical premium usually removes support from gold, and yesterday the two moved together instead.

How I read itIn defence our model has been short across the sector since late August, and yesterday's easing worked in our favour: RTX at 4.88%, Boeing at 5.77%, BAE Systems at 2.50%, Lockheed Martin at 0.56%. In gold we are long since August, with Newmont at 12.64%. On oil one thing deserves saying, and the price action makes it plain: the four-week trend is still up, but crude has given back almost 6% over the last two weeks and the latest sessions are all lower. Over the medium term the direction has not changed; over the short term it has, and defence is already pricing it.
Lockheed Martin short (G / P) · RTX short (G / P) · Boeing short (G / P) · BAE Systems short (G / P) · Newmont long (G / P) · Barrick Mining long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇮🇹
ITALY
The index pays for banks and insurers

Milan lower: Poste, FinecoBank, Telecom Italia and Generali stocks down more than 3%, Generali stock at a one-month low, STMicroelectronics against the tide

Milan shed 0.45% with the damage concentrated in four names, all down more than 3%. Poste ItalianeShort closed at the bottom of the index at minus 3.97%, FinecoBankShort lost 3.69%, Telecom ItaliaLong 3.34% with the second tranche of the ongoing public offer, and Generali stockLong 3.30%. Behind them Banco BPMShort at minus 1.74%, UnipolLong at minus 1.60%, Banca MediolanumShort at minus 1.10% and BPERLong at minus 1.09%. The two large banks limited the damage: Intesa SanpaoloLong at minus 0.71%, UniCreditLong at minus 0.53%.

Against the tide, STMicroelectronicsShort rose 4.37% on the global chip rally, followed by PrysmianShort at 2.54%, CampariLong at 1.95%, LottomaticaLong at 1.64%, PirelliShort at 1.54% and NexiLong at 1.40%. Among the day's corporate stories, the press reports a buyback announced by the holding company of StellantisShort, which closed at minus 0.24%, and the agreement under which Saxo Bank takes full ownership of BG Saxo from the Generali group. AvioShort and LeonardoShort lost 1.60% and 1.40% in the wake of the European defence decline.

How I read itOn Italian banks our model has been long since April and the session eroded little of wide gains: Mediobanca at 38.51%, Monte dei Paschi at 29.35%, Intesa Sanpaolo at 19.00%, UniCredit at 15.97%, Unipol at 14.67%, BPER at 9.75%. On the short side the position on Stellantis stands at 28.44%, while Poste at 1.73% and FinecoBank at 3.48% — both opened on 7 September — were rewarded precisely yesterday. We are long Generali and Telecom Italia and the day went against us; we are short STMicroelectronics since July at 13.35%, and yesterday's rally took something off a gain that remains wide. Intesa Sanpaolo is the only name where we keep an entry zone armed: price sits 2.15% below it, and in two weeks it has moved without deciding.
Poste Italiane short (G / P) · FinecoBank short (G / P) · Telecom Italia long (G / P) · Assicurazioni Generali long (G / P) · Banco BPM short (G / P) · UNIPOL ASSICURAZIONI long (G / P) · Banca Mediolanum short (G / P) · BPER Banca long (G / P) · Intesa Sanpaolo long (G / P) · UniCredit long (G / P) · STMicroelectronics short (G / P) · Prysmian short (G / P) · Davide Campari-Milano long (G / P) · Lottomatica long (G / P) · Pirelli & C. short (G / P) · Nexi long (G / P) · Stellantis Milano short (G / P) · Avio short (G / P) · Leonardo short (G / P) · Mediobanca long (G / P) · Monte dei Paschi long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
🇪🇺
EUROPE
Telecoms and defence under pressure

Mixed Europe: Infineon and Siemens Energy stocks up, Orange stock down 4%, telecoms the worst sector

In Europe the worst sector was telecoms at minus 2.15%, and the name that dragged it there is OrangeShort, down 4.13%. Continental banks lost 1.01%, with BarclaysShort at minus 1.23% and HSBCLong at minus 1.59%. Also lower Rolls-RoyceLong at minus 1.53% and BMWLong at minus 0.93%.

On the other side European technology gained 1.60%, with InfineonShort up 3.16% in the wake of US chips, Siemens EnergyShort up 1.89% and EssilorLuxotticaShort up 2.30%. Flat SiemensShort at 0.13% and Schneider ElectricShort unchanged; UnileverLong up 1.20%, BayerLong up 1.06%, L'OréalLong up 1.49% and RWELong up 0.84%. VolkswagenLong recovered 0.32%.

How I read itIn French telecoms our model has been short since August and collected yesterday: Orange at 5.26%. The long-running shorts hold up — EssilorLuxottica at 48.78% since December, Novo Nordisk at 14.14% and Siemens Energy at 7.70% — although yesterday's rally took something off the last two. We are short Infineon at 5.55% and the day went against us. On German carmakers and on Glencore this week's candle is turning the signal to sell: a reversal still forming, to be confirmed on Friday. For swing trading in Europe the reading is that the deciding sector is no longer autos: it is telecoms and banks, which move with the spread.
Orange short (G / P) · Barclays short (G / P) · HSBC long (G / P) · Rolls-Royce long (G / P) · Bayerische Motoren Werke long (G / P) · Infineon Technologies short (G / P) · Siemens Energy short (G / P) · EssilorLuxottica short (G / P) · Siemens short (G / P) · Schneider Electric short (G / P) · Unilever long (G / P) · Bayer long (G / P) · L'Oreal long (G / P) · RWE long (G / P) · Volkswagen AG Pref long (G / P) · Novo Nordisk short (G / P) · Glencore long (G / P) · Mercedes-Benz long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
INDICES
Four baskets, one direction

European indices still below their weekly sell signal, with Milan inside its congestion zone

On Tuesday the FTSE MIB ETF FTSE MIB ETFShort lost 0.45% and the FTSE 100 ETF FTSE 100 ETFShort 0.29%, while the CAC 40 ETF CAC 40 ETFShort gained 0.13%. On the German basket DAX ETFShort our data provider delivered a series that does not match ours and our data guard refused to write it: for that instrument we use the weekly reading only, and we are not publishing a daily change.

The map has not changed: all four baskets remain below their own weekly sell signal. Milan is the tightest and most interesting case — the typical price of the week in formation sits 1.76% below the level that judges it, and price has ended up exactly inside its congestion zone, 0.56% from the ceiling and 1.52% from the floor. Paris, selling since 24 August, is the only one with the short in profit; Frankfurt and London turned to sell only last week.

How I read itThe Italian basket is the only one of the four with price inside its own congestion band, and that changes the reading: there our model proposes no entries in either direction, and anyone trading does so against the congestion. Its 20-day and 50-day averages both sit inside the band, with price closing to the cent on the 50-day. On top of that Milan's weekly directional index is at 28.8, the highest of the seven baskets we follow: the underlying direction is bearish and not in question, what is missing is the movement. It gets decided at the floor of the band, not before.
FTSE MIB ETF short (G / P) · CAC 40 ETF short (G / P) · FTSE 100 ETF short (G / P) · DAX ETF short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📊
INSTRUMENTS
Where the money went

The ETFs that moved the session: the materials ETF, the US banks ETF, the semiconductor ETF, the gold ETF, the European telecoms ETF and the European technology ETF

XLB — the Materials Select Sector SPDR, the US materials ETF — was the best sector of the session at 1.65%, even though it remains the furthest behind on the month. At the other end XLF — the Financial Select Sector SPDR, the US banks ETF — lost 1.97%, its second heavy session in three days, taking the month to minus 4.66%. XLP — the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR, the defensive consumer ETF — gained 0.99%: a defensive combination that does not usually accompany a technology rally.

Among the sector baskets, SOXX — the iShares Semiconductor, the semiconductor ETF that tracks the main semiconductor stocks — rose 2.40%, and GLD — SPDR Gold Shares, the most heavily traded gold ETF in the world — 0.42%. In Europe EXV2 — the iShares STOXX Europe 600 Telecommunications, the European telecoms ETF — lost 2.15%, the worst on the continent, while EXV3 — the iShares STOXX Europe 600 Technology, the European technology ETF — gained 1.60%.

How I read itThe day's combination is unusual and matters more than the individual numbers: materials, defensive goods and gold rose together while banks fell. Those are the three places money goes when it reduces risk without leaving the market. Our model is long the gold ETF since August and long European banks since April, short the US banks ETF and short the materials one, where the day went against us. On the semiconductor ETF the confirmed signal is still a sell and this week's candle is turning it to buy: the third reversal still forming today, and all three sit in the same sector.
US materials ETF short (G / P) · US financials ETF short (G / P) · US consumer staples ETF long (G / P) · semiconductor ETF short (G / P) · gold ETF long (G / P) · European telecoms ETF long (G / P) · European technology ETF short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
OUR MODEL
The cohort on day two

This week's new buy signals: Virgin Galactic, Inwit, MARA Holdings, Tesco and Apple, all still above entry

From Tuesday to Friday this card reports only what changes. On day two the 5 new buy signals born on Friday 18 September are all still above their own entry: Virgin GalacticLong at 8.14%, MARA HoldingsLong at 2.95%, InwitLong at 2.84%, TescoLong at 1.22% and AppleLong at 1.08%. None changed side on the daily, none reports earnings this week, none has left the cohort.

The caveat always applies: past data do not guarantee future results.

How I read itThe movement has shifted: yesterday Virgin Galactic led, today the largest change belongs to MARA Holdings, up 2.64% on the bitcoin rebound, moving from last to second in the cohort. The starting judgement stands: MARA has the most fragile signal history in the group, with a 12.1% historical success rate over 33 cases, and one day of momentum does not change it. Tesco and Inwit keep doing what a steady profile is expected to do, which is little and in the right direction.
Virgin Galactic long (G / P) · MARA long (G / P) · INWIT long (G / P) · Tesco long (G / P) · Apple long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📅
CALENDAR
Earnings in the next seven days

This week's earnings: Costco tomorrow, Uranium Energy on Friday, Carnival next Tuesday

Three companies in our universe report between now and next Tuesday. Just beyond the window come MicronLong on 30 September and AccentureLong on 1 October.

Thursday 24 September

Costco Wholesale Short

Friday 25 September

Uranium Energy Short

Tuesday 29 September

Carnival Short

How I read itOn Costco our model has been short since 26 May at 5.95% and reaches the results with a gain to protect; on Carnival we are short since August at 13.41%. Micron arrives at its results as the strongest name on our entire candidate list, and precisely for that reason the house rule says to enter with the smallest size: the way we read earnings is measured, and results do not shift the average return, they widen its dispersion.
Costco Wholesale short (G / P) · Uranium Energy short (G / P) · Carnival short (G / P) · Micron Technology long (G / P) · Accenture long (G / P) *
↑ back to menu
📈
UNITED STATES
Two baskets, two ages

Technical analysis of SPY and QQQ: the S&P 500 flat because its engines cancel out, the Nasdaq 100 at a record close

SPY, the S&P 500 ETF S&P 500Long, closed flat at minus 0.02%, 0.77% below its all-time high; QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 ETF Invesco QQQ TrustLong, added 0.81% and marked the highest close in its history. Applying each basket's sector weights to the sector moves, SPY should have done minus 0.01% and QQQ plus 0.33%: the first matched the arithmetic to the cent, the second beat it by half a point thanks to chipmakers.

The difference is entirely composition. In the Nasdaq 100 financials weigh 0.24%, in the S&P 500 12.59%: the same minus 2% in banking takes half a cent off the first and a quarter of a point off the second, which technology exactly offset. On levels, QQQ has four references packed within twelve hundredths of a percent above price — all-time high, weekly upper band and first target window — and that window expires at Friday's close. SPY has only the record ahead of it, at 0.77%, with all three windows already taken in its twenty-fourth week.

How I read itThese are two trades in opposite phases: SPY protects a mature 13.82% gain where only the trailing stop matters, QQQ has every window ahead of it in week six. Risk management, though, treats them the same way: on both, the distance to the stop against the distance to the target is below one to one, so adding here pays on neither. The real operational difference is elsewhere: SPY sits just 0.91% above its congestion zone and can fall back inside on one bad session, while QQQ has moved 3.44% away from its own. The broad basket has the nearer shelter, the narrow one has more road and no cushion.
S&P 500 long (G / P) · Invesco QQQ Trust long (G / P) · Russell 2000 ETF short (G / P) *
↑ back to menu

The desk's take

The big picture: a market rotating without leaving

Tuesday's session comes down to one sentence: money changed house without leaving the neighbourhood. In the United States the broad index stood still because its two main engines cancelled each other out, and beneath that flat surface two percentage points moved between those selling financials and those buying materials and defensive goods. In Europe the same movement produced a worse result, because on these baskets — and on the Italian one most of all — there is no sector large enough to absorb what leaves the banks. What I would watch over the next two or three sessions is whether banks, insurers and travel recover: if they do not, Tuesday was not a bad day but the start of a repricing.

What you find here. If you are trying to understand how to manage risk in trading — stops, break-even stops, trailing, and the declaration of stops that have been taken out — or how to read chart patterns (double bottoms, Bollinger bands, the Ichimoku cloud, price action trading), this is the desk's trading journal: published every morning before the US premarket, with our model's position on every instrument mentioned.

Previous editions
22 September 2026Technical analysis: Intel, AMD and Meta stock reignite Wall Street as semiconductor stocks rally and Milan rebounds with its banks21 September 2026Technical analysis: the SEC lifts crypto stocks as Strategy and Coinbase soar, while Europe slides with Stellantis and the banks18 September 2026Technical analysis: the day after the Fed, semiconductor stocks lead the rebound with Arm, Intel and AMD17 September 2026Technical analysis: the Fed hikes, bank stocks and oil stocks fall, chip stocks rise with Intel and Marvell16 September 2026Technical analysis: oil stocks rally as crude tops 107 dollars, Circle and Coinbase stock sink before the Fed, and the ten-year yield hits 5%15 September 2026Technical analysis: semiconductor stocks sink and CrowdStrike stock soars on the call to slow down AI, with oil back above 100 dollarsView all editions on the tag page →

* Our system — The rows of names at the foot of each card carry our model's position, long or short. Position from the latest published weekly analysis. Levels, targets and the trading plan sit in each instrument's own page. The two letters in brackets lead to the instrument page (G) and the full analysis (P).

Disclaimer. The content on this page is published for educational and informational purposes and reflects the author's personal opinion and technical analysis. It does not constitute financial advice, an investment solicitation, or a personalised recommendation. Trading in financial instruments carries a high level of risk and may result in substantial loss of the capital invested. Every operating decision rests solely with the reader, who acts independently and in full awareness of that risk. AiTrading67 is not a broker or financial intermediary and is not affiliated with any broker or trading platform.
Sources
Share WhatsApp Telegram Gmail LinkedIn